Bill Tracker
based on: Profile: Housing
 Loading... Please Wait
You have 19 bills in your selected Profile
download to spreadsheet
download to pdf
download to docx
Notes about this profile:
LAC Lobbyists: Kathy Smith, Jo Feder, Trish Warner, Kate Van Houten
Bill:
HB23-1068
|
Title: |
Pet Animal Ownership In Housing |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/19/2023 | Description | Concerning pet animal ownership in housing, and, in connection therewith, prohibiting restrictions on dog breeds for obtaining homeowner's insurance, providing for the manner in which pet animals are handled when a writ of restitution is executed, limiting security deposits and rent for pet animals, and excluding pet animals from personal property liens. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Health Care & Health Insurance- Housing- Insurance- State Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: A. Valdez (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/27/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 2 of the bill prohibits insurers from denying a
homeowner's insurance policy based on the breed or mixture of breeds of dog that resides at the insured dwelling, while allowing denial if a specific individual dog is a dangerous dog. Insurers are also prohibited from asking or otherwise inquiring about the specific breed or mixture of breeds of dog kept at a dwelling except to ask if the dog is known to be or has been declared a dangerous dog.
Section 3 requires that an officer executing a writ of restitution
inspect the premises for pet animals and give any pet animal found to the tenant of the premises if the tenant is present at the time the writ is executed. If a tenant is not present, the landlord must contact a local animal shelter or pet animal rescue to take custody of any pet animal and leave contact information for the tenant as to where the pet animal has been taken. An officer or any other person in connection with execution of the writ is prohibited from removing and leaving any pet animal unattended on public or private property.
Section 4 prohibits a landlord from demanding or receiving a
security deposit or rent in exchange for allowing a pet animal to reside on the residential premises with a tenant.
Section 5 creates the pet friendly landlord damage mitigation
program to be administered by the department of local affairs, subject to availability of funding. Under the program, a landlord may receive reimbursement for actual damage caused to a rental premises by a pet animal allowed to reside with the tenant up to $1,000. Reimbursements are granted on a first come, first served basis, and a landlord must provide documentation in support of the damages for which the landlord makes the claim of reimbursement. The department has authority to promulgate rules to implement the program. A landlord who receives reimbursement under the program is prohibited from taking legal action against the tenant for the damages or from pursing collection against the tenant for the damages.
Section 6 excludes pet animals from the categories of a tenant's
personal property that a person who rents furnished or unfurnished rooms or apartments may place a lien on for unpaid board, lodging, or rent.
Section 7 of the bill prohibits the existing Colorado affordable
housing tax credit from being allocated unless tenants are allowed to keep pet animals at a qualified development where the tenant resides. The required allowance of pet animals is subject to state and local laws governing public health, animal control, and animal anti-cruelty, and is
subject to reasonable conditions that may be imposed on the allowance of pet animals. Reasonable conditions do not include prohibitions on pet animal breeds or weight restrictions of a pet animal.
| House Sponsors | A. Valdez (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1095
|
Title: |
Prohibited Provisions In Rental Agreements |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/20/2023 | Description | Concerning prohibiting the inclusion of certain provisions in written rental agreements. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) N. Hinrichsen (D) House: S. Woodrow (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/08/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
This bill prohibits certain predatory clauses that take advantage of tenants from being included in leases.
Updates the law to prohibit the following provisions:
- a waiver of the right to a jury trial;
- a waiver of the ability to bring, join, litigate, or support collective claims and actions;
- a waiver of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing;
- a waiver of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment
- a provision that purports to affix fees, damages, or penalties for tenants’ failure to provide notice of nonrenewal of a rental agreement;
- a provision that defines any amount or fee other than the set monthly payment for occupancy, including utilities and service charges, as “rent,” and would allow landlords to collect such fees through rental collection remedies, including eviction; and
- a provision that requires tenants to pay for a service billed to landlords by third-party in an amount greater than what the third-party bills landlords
League position supports policies that protect affordable housing opportunities for all. Additional penalty clauses/fees create a financial barrier to housing costs.
| Summary | Current law prohibits a written rental agreement from including:
An unreasonable liquidated damages clause that assigns a cost to a party stemming from an eviction notice or an eviction action for a violation of the rental agreement; or
A one-way, fee-shifting clause that awards attorney fees and court costs only to one party. Any fee-shifting clause
in a rental agreement must award attorney fees to the prevailing party in a court dispute.
The bill amends these prohibitions so that:
A written rental agreement must not include any clause that assigns a penalty to a party stemming from an eviction notice or an eviction action that results from a violation of the rental agreement; and
Any fee-shifting clause in a rental agreement must award attorney fees to the prevailing party only following a determination that the party prevailed and the fee is reasonable.
The bill also prohibits a written rental agreement from including:
A waiver of the right to a jury trial; the ability to pursue, bring, join, litigate, or support certain class or collective claims or actions; the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; or the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment;
A provision that purports to affix any fee, damages, or penalty for a tenant's failure to provide notice of nonrenewal of a rental agreement prior to the end of the rental agreement;
A provision that characterizes any amount or fee set forth in the rental agreement, with the sole exception of the set monthly payment for occupancy of the premises, as rent for which all remedies to collect rent, including eviction, are available; or
A provision that requires a tenant to pay a fee in excess of the amount the landlord paid for a service for which the landlord is billed by a third party or that purports to recoup costs incurred by the landlord in processing any such services or billing.
| House Sponsors | S. Woodrow (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) N. Hinrichsen (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | - April 04, 2023: Senate Local Government & Housing Committee Report
- April 04, 2023: Senate Local Government & Housing Committee Report
- February 09, 2023: House Business Affairs & Labor Committee Report
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.001 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.002 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.003 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.004 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.005 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: HB23-1095 L.006 House Business Affairs & Labor
- February 09, 2023: House Business Affairs & Labor Committee Report
|
|
Bill:
HB23-1099
|
Title: |
Portable Screening Report For Residential Leases |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/23/2023 | Description | Concerning tenant screening documentation for residential leases. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Business & Economic Development- Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Fields (D) T. Exum Sr. (D) House: M. Weissman (D) S. Vigil (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (05/31/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill requires a landlord to accept from a prospective tenant a
portable tenant screening report (screening report). A screening report must have been prepared by a consumer reporting agency (agency) within the previous 30 days at the prospective tenant's request and expense and include certain information about the prospective tenant.
If a prospective tenant provides a screening report, the landlord
shall not charge the prospective tenant either an application fee or a fee for the landlord to access or use the screening report.
Prior to collecting any tenant information that would generate an
application fee, a landlord shall advise a prospective tenant that the landlord accepts screening reports and is prohibited from charging an application fee or other fee to a prospective tenant who provides a screening report.
If a prospective tenant's rental application is denied, and the
landlord charged the prospective tenant an application fee to obtain a consumer report, the landlord shall provide a copy of the consumer report to the prospective tenant, along with a notice of the prospective tenant's right to dispute the accuracy of the consumer report. If the prospective tenant did not pay an application fee for the landlord to obtain a consumer report, the landlord's notice of denial must include either a copy of the consumer report or the agency's contact information and notice of the prospective tenant's right to receive a free copy of the consumer report and to dispute the accuracy of the consumer report.
The bill authorizes the attorney general's office to independently
initiate and bring an action to enforce the Rental Application Fairness Act.
| House Sponsors | M. Weissman (D) S. Vigil (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Fields (D) T. Exum Sr. (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (05/04/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1115
|
Title: |
Repeal Prohibition Local Residential Rent Control |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/23/2023 | Description | Concerning the repeal of statutory provisions prohibiting local governments from enacting rent control on private residential property or a private residential housing unit. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Rodriguez (D) House: J. Mabrey (D) E. Velasco (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/05/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
HB23-1115 repeals current law prohibiting a local government from enacting laws that control rent on private residential real property, or private residential housing. Removing the state prohibition on local rent control ordinances does not create a statewide rent control law or change expenditures or revenue of any state agency or local government. If passed, this bill allows local governments to choose to adopt local ordinances or regulations to stabilize rent prices. There is no appropriation required for this bill and it has been assessed by the Legislative Council Staff as having no fiscal impact.
Through the legislative process during House Floor work, the following provisions were adopted by Amendments noted below: If a local government chooses to adopt a rent control policy, the bill places certain conditions on those policies as follows. • It must be uniformly applied among all renters and all private residential properties and housing units that are similarly situated. • It may not be applied for 15 years from the date when the first certificate of occupancy was issued on a residential property or housing unit, except for mobile homes. • Any limits on annual rent increases must not be for less than the percentage increase in the consumer price index plus three percentage points, plus reasonable increases reflective of the actual costs incurred and demonstrated by a landlord in conducting substantial renovations. • It must not apply to housing units that are already rent stabilized. Regardless of the first two of these guidelines, the bill permits a local government to have or adopt an ordinance or regulation that is expressly intended and designed to increase the supply of affordable housing. The bill also makes a conforming amendment.
The LWVCO supported a similar bill in 2019 (SB19-225—Authorize Local Governments to Stabilize Rent) that did not become law. The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person. Currently, there is no limit on the amount that a landlord can increase rent each year. Colorado is the 8th least affordable state. The Colorado Health Foundation 2022 Pulse Poll (www.copulsepoll.org/results) found that Coloradans are overwhelmed by the rising cost of living and the cost of housing. The cost of living is rated as the top problem in every region of the state. Many Coloradans are making difficult financial tradeoffs to stay on top of economic pressures. Some are skipping meals because they can’t afford food; others are going without health care or working more in order to pay for their housing; many are experiencing mental health strain but say out-of-pocket costs are a challenge to getting the help they need. Only one in four people who quality for rental subsidies receives them.
LWVCO is fully committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to create a more perfect democracy. The National Low Income Housing Coalition reports that 74% of Colorado’s extremely low income renter households spend more than half of their income on housing (https://nlihc.org/housing-needs-by-state/colorado). About 40% of these households are in the labor force, and many households include older adults, single caregivers, or disabled persons. The average annual income to afford a 2-bedroom apartment in Colorado is about $60K, or about $29/hour full time (https://nlihc.org/oor/state/co). High rent prices in Colorado disproportionately impact persons employed in occupational groups with lower median wages and people of color.
LWVCO Supports this bill.
| Summary | The bill repeals statutory provisions prohibiting counties and
municipalities from enacting any ordinance or resolution that would control rent on private residential property or a private residential housing
unit. The bill also makes a conforming amendment.
| House Sponsors | J. Mabrey (D) E. Velasco (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Rodriguez (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely (04/25/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1120
|
Title: |
Eviction Protections For Residential Tenants |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/27/2023 | Description | Concerning eviction protections for residential tenants who receive public assistance, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Courts & Judicial | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Fields (D) F. Winter (D) House: D. Ortiz (D) J. Joseph (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/13/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Strongly Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
HB23-1120 requires a landlord and residential tenant to participate in mandatory neutral mediation prior to commencing an eviction action if the residential tenant discloses that they receive cash assistance including:
Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI)
Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
This bill also extends the period after an eviction judgment before law enforcement can execute a writ of restitution from 10 to 30 days for tenants who receive cash assistance. The bill requires that a written rental agreement include a statement that a residential tenant who receives cash assistance has a right to mediation prior to the landlord filing an eviction complaint with the court, and it prohibits a written rental agreement from including a waiver of mandatory mediation.
The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person. There is a large disparity in access to legal representation between landlords and people experiencing eviction. A 2021 study found that tenants receive legal counsel in 1% of eviction cases while landlords are represented in 77% of cases. Prelitigation mediation facilitates communication between tenants and landlords and can result in reasonable alternatives to eviction. Keeping people housed and preventing evictions saves taxpayers money by reducing public spending and saves property owners from incurring expenses from legal fees, vacancies, and resident turnovers.
LWVCO is fully committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to create a more perfect democracy. The 2022 Affordable Housing Transformational Task Force found that Colorado has a severe deficit of rental units to meet current demand. Tenants with disabilities face additional barriers to finding housing that meets their accessibility requirements, and tenants who receive cash assistance face additional barriers to finding housing that is affordable on a fixed income. Only one in four people who quality for rental subsidies receives them.
| Summary | The bill requires a landlord and residential tenant to participate in
mandatory mediation prior to commencing an eviction action if the residential tenant receives supplemental security income, federal social security disability insurance, or cash assistance through the Colorado works program (collectively, cash assistance). The landlord and residential tenant do not have to participate in mediation if the residential
tenant did not disclose or declined to disclose in writing to the landlord that the residential tenant receives cash assistance. Failure to comply with mandatory mediation is an affirmative defense.
The bill prohibits a law enforcement officer from executing a writ
of restitution against a residential tenant for at least 30 days after the entry of judgment if the residential tenant receives cash assistance.
The bill requires a written rental agreement to include a statement
that a residential tenant who receives cash assistance has a right to mediation prior to the landlord filing an eviction complaint with the court.
The bill prohibits a written rental agreement from including a
waiver of mandatory mediation.
| House Sponsors | D. Ortiz (D) J. Joseph (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Fields (D) F. Winter (D) | House Committee | Judiciary | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/06/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1171
|
Title: |
Just Cause Requirement Eviction Of Residential Tenant |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/02/2023 | Description | Concerning requiring just cause for the eviction of a tenant from a residential premises. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Gonzales (D) N. Hinrichsen (D) House: S. Gonzales-Gutierrez (D) J. Mabrey (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/05/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
LWV Position on Housing:
It is the responsibility of all levels of government to provide equality of opportunity for education, employment, and housing for all persons in the United States regardless of their race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age, sexual orientation, or disability.
Housing Team Report from 03/17/23
All but one of the previous concerns expressed to the sponsors by the Housing Team and members of LWVCO have been heavily negotiated to a mutually-satisfactory set of amendments and provisions that help tenants and landlords. For this reason we are asking for a change from Monitor to a Support position.
This bill provides requirements for notice to tenant by landlord of conditions that, if left uncured for a specified amount of time, would be considered, “just cause for eviction.”
HB23-1171 also provides for instances of “no fault eviction.” No fault eviction would be where the building is demolished, or major renovations make it unlivable, or the landlord or a member of landlord’s family want to reside in the unit. The bill also provides for notice from tenant to landlord of tenant’s intention to quit the premises, which was missing from the original bill.
Summary after passage in the House on 03/15/23
Exemptions to the entire Bill:
- Short-term rentals
- Single-family residences that are an owner’s primary residence and the owner lives on-site and rents a portion of the home (i.e. basement apartment/ADU)
- Mobile homeowner leasing a lot in a mobile home park
Just Cause Evictions:
- Existing reasons under current law for evictions with all procedures and notice requirements remain the same under HB23-1171:
- Tenant holdover + nonpayment of rent
- Tenant holdover + substantial violation (defined in 13-40-107.5 (3) which includes criminal activity)
- Tenant holdover + non-compliance of a lease condition
- Two new reasons for eviction
- Tenant holdover + failure to sign a substantially similar lease
- Tenant holdover + denying the landlord entry
- No-fault Eviction Reasons
- Demolition or conversion of residential premises
- Substantial repairs or renovations (not related to Warranty of Habitability)
- Landlord or family member of landlord assumes occupancy
- Time-limited housing (hotel/motel short-term residences) offered by a public housing authority or nonprofit.
- Withdrawal from the rental market for the purpose of selling the residential premises
Notice Language Requirements:
- Landlords are required to provide notice in English and in either:
- The second most common language in the census tract of the residential premises; or
- In any other language the landlord knows or has reason to know is the primary language of the tenant.
Relocation Assistance:
- Exemptions:
- A tenant who is renting a property that is not their primary residence.
- A landlord whose rental income is less than $6500/month after payment of mortgages, escrows/property taxes, and HOA fees.
- If a landlord can provide substantially similar housing accommodations and amenities.
- A landlord who chooses to put a single-family home, townhome or individual condo on the market to sell.
- Mobile homeowner leasing a lot in a mobile home park.
- Public housing authority or nonprofit that is required to provide federal relocation assistance and such assistance is more beneficial than what is required in the bill.
- Public housing authority or nonprofit exercises the no-fault time-limited housing eviction.
- Rental assistance for a landlord not qualifying under an exemption:
- Two months of rent; and
- One month additional rent if any of the following tenants reside in the premises at the time of eviction:
- An individual less than 18 or more than 60
- Low-income individual
- An individual with a disability
Notice to Quit:
- Establishes criteria and a process for a tenant to terminate a tenancy with notice conditional on the amount of time the tenant has lived in the premises.
LWVCO Supports this bill.
| Summary | The bill prohibits a landlord from evicting a residential tenant
unless the landlord has just cause for eviction. Just cause exists when:
The tenant continues to fail to pay rent after the landlord provides the tenant timely written notice of such nonpayment;
The tenant commits a substantial violation and does not
cure it within 10 days after the landlord provides the tenant written notice of the substantial violation;
Conditions exist for a no-fault eviction;
The tenant refuses to allow the landlord to enter the residential premises after the landlord has provided written notice of such entry at least 48 hours before attempting such entry, unless the rental agreement specifies a longer period of advanced written notice; or
The tenant refuses to sign a new rental agreement with terms that are substantially identical to the tenant's current rental agreement, so long as the landlord proffers the new rental agreement at least 30 days before the expiration of the current rental agreement.
The following conditions constitute grounds for a no-fault eviction
of a tenant, with certain limitations:
Demolition or conversion of the residential premises;
Substantial repairs or renovations to the residential premises; or
Occupancy of the residential premises assumed by the landlord or a family member of the landlord.
A landlord that proceeds with a no-fault eviction of a tenant must
provide relocation assistance to the tenant in the amount of 2 months' rent plus the amount of one additional month of rent if any of the following individuals reside in the residential premises at the time the landlord proceeds with the no-fault eviction:
An individual who is less than 18 years of age or at least 60 years of age;
A low-income individual; or
An individual with a disability.
If a landlord proceeds with an eviction of a tenant of a residential
premises in violation of the new provisions, the tenant may seek relief as provided in existing laws concerning unlawful removal of a tenant.
| House Sponsors | S. Gonzales-Gutierrez (D) J. Mabrey (D) | Senate Sponsors | J. Gonzales (D) N. Hinrichsen (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Senate Second Reading Special Order - Laid Over Daily - No Amendments (05/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1184
|
Title: |
Low-income Housing Property Tax Exemptions |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/08/2023 | Description | Concerning certain low-income housing property that is deemed to be used for a strictly charitable purpose, and, in connection therewith, clarifying and expanding the property tax exemption for property acquired by nonprofit housing providers for a strictly charitable low-income housing purpose and creating a property tax exemption for property held by community land trusts or nonprofit affordable homeownership developers and used for a strictly charitable purpose. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Fiscal Policy & Taxes | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) House: W. Lindstedt (D) L. Frizell (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/11/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
Introduced inn House 2/3/23 Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
SPONSORS: Rep. H. Lindstedt| Rep. L. Fritzell| Sen. D. Roberts
First hearing Tuesday, February 28, 2023
Affordable for-sale homes options are almost non-existent across Colorado, and nonprofit affordable homeownership developers and Community Land Trusts are playing an increasingly larger role in helping low-income Coloradans access home ownership and the benefits that come with it. Land is the greatest expense when developing affordable for-sale housing. HB23 1184 aims to stimulate the creation of more affordable homeownership development through targeted and limited property tax exemptions aimed at reducing the cost of land. HB23 1184 will (1) expand an existing property tax exemption for real property on which affordable for sale homes are constructed or rehabilitated by certain affordable homeownership providers and (2) add a new property tax exemption on land that is owned by certain affordable homeownership providers to create permanently affordable for-sale homes.
This bill is needed because it: * Helps achieve affordability in homeownership for families at or under 100% of their area median income * Aligns with state’s priorities for increasing the affordable housing stock *Aligns statute with the time needed to develop affordable homeownership opportunities * Creates savings through the property tax exemption that reduces the cost of land, better enabling providers to save on overall construction costs and provide a more affordable home to future homeowners. * Ensures homes under the new property tax exemption remain part of the affordable homeownership stock. The proposed changes: * Expand the definitions of “nonprofit housing provider” in State statue 39-3 113.5 so all nonprofit affordable homeownership providers can use the property tax exemption * Increase the area medium income qualification for “low-income applicants” served tp 100% or less from 80% * Extent the period that the exemption may be claimed from five years to ten years *Create a new property tax exemption for community land trusts (CLT) and other nonprofit affordable homeownership providers that develop permanently affordable for-sale homes on land which is owned by the CLT or nonprofit affordable homeownership provider. This exemption will apply to the land only. The home, which will be sold to low-income families, will continue to be taxed.
You may be interested in organizations that support this bill: Elevation Community Land Trust Habitat for Humanity of Colorado Housing Colorado Colorado Affordable Homeownership Alliance
| Summary | Section 1 of the bill clarifies and expands the current property tax
exemption for property acquired by nonprofit housing providers for low-income housing. The bill clarifies that property may qualify for the property tax exemption, through construction on the property, until the property is sold or transferred. The bill expands the definition of low-income applicants to include individuals or families who are at or below 100% of the area median income, rather than 80% of the area median income.
Section 2 deems certain property held by community land trusts
and nonprofit affordable homeownership developers to be used for a strictly charitable purpose, and to consequently be exempt from property taxation in accordance with the state constitution. To qualify for the exemption, the property must be split into a separate taxable parcel from the improvements on the property and leased to the owner of the improvements as an affordable homeownership property.
| House Sponsors | W. Lindstedt (D) L. Frizell (R) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Finance | Status | Governor Signed (05/25/2023) | Amendments | - April 28, 2023: Senate Appropriations Committee Report
- April 25, 2023: Senate Finance Committee Report
- March 30, 2023: House Appropriations Committee Report
- March 30, 2023: House Appropriations Committee Report
- March 06, 2023: House Finance Committee Report
- March 06, 2023: House Finance Committee Report
- February 28, 2023: House Transportation, Housing & Local Government Committee Report
- February 28, 2023: House Transportation, Housing & Local Government Committee Report
|
|
Bill:
HB23-1186
|
Title: |
Remote Participation In Residential Evictions |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/08/2023 | Description | Concerning remote participation in a residential eviction filed in county court, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Courts & Judicial | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: T. Exum Sr. (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: I. Jodeh (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/24/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
HB23-1186 requires that the court allow either party or any witness to choose to appear in person or remotely (by phone or video) for court proceedings related to residential eviction actions. The bill also authorizes a defendant to file an Answer electronically, authorizes either party to file a motion or other documents electronically, and prohibits the court from assessing fees for e-filing documents. It requires the court to comply with federal and state regulations regarding accommodations for people with a disability or for people with limited English proficiency. The bill prohibits the court from entering a default judgment if a party is unable to participate remotely due to a technological disconnection or failure.
The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person. Currently, when a tenant does not appear for an eviction court proceeding, a default judgment is automatically entered against them, and the tenant is evicted without a hearing. Many tenants face significant barriers to appearing in person for eviction proceedings, including work, child care, transportation, and living with a disability. Tenants living in rural parts of Colorado can be particularly challenged in appearing in person for an eviction, as county courthouses can be located many miles away. The option of remote participation will result in fewer default judgments and an increase in participation.
LWVCO is fully committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to create a more perfect democracy. Currently some judges allow parties in an eviction to participate remotely, but this varies statewide. Uniform access to due process and justice requires statewide uniformity for eviction proceedings, including having a choice for remote participation, and accommodations for people with a disability or people with limited English proficiency.
| Summary | For a residential eviction action filed in county court, the bill:
Requires the court to allow either party or any witness to choose to appear in person or remotely at any return, conference, hearing, trial, or other court proceeding;
Authorizes a pro se defendant to file an answer electronically by e-mail, or at the court's discretion, through
an e-filing system; and authorizes either party, if the party is pro se, to file a motion or other documents electronically by e-mail, or at the court's discretion, through an e-filing system;
Prohibits the court from assessing an e-filing fee or service fee on a motion to waive filing fees, or from assessing an e-filing fee, service fee, or any other fee associated with the electronic filing or e-mailing of motions, answers, or documents for an indigent party; and
Requires the court to comply with federal and state law or regulations, including supreme court directive or policy, regarding the provision of accommodation for people with a disability or for people with limited English proficiency.
If a party is appearing remotely and the party is disconnected, the
bill requires the court to make all reasonable efforts to contact the party and allow reasonable time for the party to reestablish connection. If the party is unable to reestablish connection, the bill requires the court to reschedule the hearing for the first available in-person date after the date of the originally scheduled hearing, but no later than one week after the originally scheduled hearing, to the extent practicable. The bill prohibits the court from entering a default judgment if a party is unable to participate remotely due to a technological disconnection or failure.
The bill requires the complaint to include a designation of whether
the plaintiff elects to participate in any hearing in person or remotely, and a box indicating if the eviction is for a residential or commercial tenancy.
The bill requires the summons to include a statement in bold-faced
type notifying the defendant that either party has a right to appear in person or remotely, include a place for the defendant to indicate whether the defendant will appear in person or remotely, and provide information for how a pro se party can electronically submit documents related to the case.
| House Sponsors | I. Jodeh (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Senate Sponsors | T. Exum Sr. (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | Judiciary | Senate Committee | Finance | Status | Governor Signed (06/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1190
|
Title: |
Affordable Housing Right Of First Refusal |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/10/2023 | Description | Concerning a right of first refusal to purchase qualifying multifamily residential property by a local government. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing- Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: E. Sirota (D) A. Boesenecker (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/09/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
HB23-1190— Affordable Housing Right of First Refusal
Concerning a right of first refusal to purchase qualifying multifamily residential property by a local government.
02/10/2023 | Introduced in House - Assigned to Transportation, Housing & Local Government
SPONSORS: Rep. A. Boesenecker | Rep. E. Sirota | Sen. F. Winter
HB23-1190 creates the right of first refusal, with certain exemptions, for local governments to purchase multi-unit residential properties for long-term affordable housing. Long-term affordable housing means that the annual rent for any unit will not exceed the rent for households of a given size at the applicable area median income for a minimum of 100 years, and the local government agrees not to raise rent for any unit by more than the bill’s specified rent increase cap. Qualifying properties include any multifamily or mixed-use property consisting of five or more residential units in urban counties, and three or more residential units in rural or rural resort counties. No appropriation is required.
The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person. Colorado has a severe shortage of affordable rental homes, and preservation of existing affordable rental housing is an essential to addressing our shortage. HB23-1190 allows local governments and housing authorities to be competitive with for-profit developers by giving them the opportunity to match the sale price and prevent affordable housing from being converted to market-rate housing.
LWVCO is fully committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to create a more perfect democracy. Colorado has about 160,000 low-income renter households but only has about 46,000 affordable homes available to rent. HB23-1190 provides an opportunity for local governments to include affordable housing within existing communities.
| Summary | The bill creates a right of first refusal of a local government to
match an acceptable offer for the sale of a residential or mixed-use multifamily property (property). The right to the purchase of the property by the local government is subject to the local government's commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing. The local
government may assign its right of first refusal to the state, to any political subdivisions, or to any housing authority in the state subject to the limitation that the assignee make the same commitment to using the property as long-term affordable housing.
The bill requires notices to be given by the seller to local
governments and by local governments to the seller and to residents of the property. Upon receiving notice of intent to sell or of a potential sale of property, a local government has 14 business days to preserve its right of first refusal and an additional 90 business days to make an offer and must agree to close on the property within 180 business days of the execution of an agreement for the sale and purchase of the qualifying property.
The bill allows certain sales of property to be exempt from the
right of first refusal and the requirements established by the bill for the right of first refusal. The bill also allows the local government to waive its right of first refusal to purchase a property if the local government elects to disclaim its rights to any proposed transaction or for any duration of time or if there is a third-party buyer interested in purchasing the property with the same commitment to preserving or converting the property for long-term affordable housing and if the third-party buyer enters into an agreement with the local government concerning the third-party buyer's commitment to long-term affordable housing.
If the local government, its assignee, or a third-party buyer who
has committed to preserving or converting the property for long-term affordable housing has acquired the property and maintained the property for long-term affordable housing for 50 years, the property may be converted to another use if the following conditions are met:
Notice is given to residents prior to the conversion;
Any displaced residents are provided with compensation for relocation; and
The local government, its assignee, or a third-party buyer who has committed to preserving or converting the property for long-term affordable housing guarantees the development or conversion of an equal or greater amount of units within the boundaries of the local government for long-term affordable housing and offers the units first to any residents displaced by the conversion of the property.
The bill also provides that the attorney general's office has
responsibility to enforce the provisions of the bill and that the attorney general's office, a local government, or a mission-driven organization has standing to bring a civil action for violations of the bill.
| House Sponsors | E. Sirota (D) A. Boesenecker (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Vetoed (06/06/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1232
|
Title: |
Extend Housing Toolkit Time Frame |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/07/2023 | Description | Concerning clarification of the scope of the authority of the division of housing to spend money for certain types of grants. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing- Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) House: J. McCluskie (D) I. Jodeh (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/27/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Sections 1 and 4 of the bill clarify that money that was transferred
from the general fund or the affordable housing and home ownership cash fund to the Colorado heritage communities fund on June 27, 2021, or as soon as was practicable thereafter, must be expended before July 1, 2025.
Section 2 clarifies that money that was transferred from the
general fund to the housing development grant fund on June 27, 2021, must be expended before July 1, 2025.
Section 3 clarifies that the division of housing may award multiple
grants to multiple grant recipients for multiple regional navigation campuses in the Denver metropolitan area to respond to and prevent homelessness.
Section 5 makes a conforming amendment.
| House Sponsors | J. McCluskie (D) I. Jodeh (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (05/17/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1254
|
Title: |
Habitability of Residential Premises |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/21/2023 | Description | Concerning the conditions covered under the warranty of habitability for residential premises, and, in connection therewith, specifying a landlord's requirements to remediate a residential premises that is damaged due to an environmental public health event, expanding what constitutes retaliation by a landlord, and describing situations in which a tenant may terminate a lease after the premises has been damaged due to an environmental public health event. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: L. Cutter (D) House: K. Brown (D) J. Mabrey (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/10/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
After the Marshall Fire most attention was on homeowners. East Colorado Housing Opportunity Coalition (ECHO) conducted a survey of renters and found three common issues: habitability, retaliation and price gouging.
It was discovered that Colorado has a warranty of habitability law, but has shortcomings when it comes to renters and fires (and other disasters like floods). First, there is no statutory definition of when a unit is sufficiently remediated. If a tenet moves into a unit following remediation and someone in the family experiences systems like headaches, respiratory problems or dizziness, there is no objective standard to determine that the unit has been sufficiently remediated. This puts the tenet in the position of trying to get the landlord to remediate adequately. And the landlord, who may have thought they had remediated adequately, of defending their work. HB23-1254 would require a landlord to have a residential premises inspected and tested by a certified industrial hygienist or an industrial hygienist to determine if a premise is safe for habitability. It also clarifies landlord responsibilities in remediating a residential premises to a habitable standard and how a tenet must give notice to a landlord if there are habitability issues with the tenant’s residence. It also prohibits a landlord from retaliating against a tenet for making a good faith complaint about the conditions of the residential premises. It also provides conditions by which a tenet may terminate a lease if a habitability issue is not remediated.
LWVCO Supports this bill.
| Summary | The bill expands conditions covered under the warranty of
habitability for residential premises in relation to indoor air quality, water quality, and other health and safety issues. The bill adds water damage, fire damage, and damage due to a natural or an environmental event as conditions under which a residential premises is deemed uninhabitable.
The bill requires a landlord to have a residential premises
inspected and tested by a certified industrial hygienist or an industrial hygienist to determine if the premises is safe for habitability. The bill also clarifies landlord responsibilities in remediating a residential premises to a habitable standard and how a tenant must give notice to a landlord if there are habitability issues with the tenant's residence.
The bill directs the executive director of the department of public
health and environment to establish health and safety standards for habitability by January 1, 2026.
The bill prohibits a landlord from retaliating against a tenant for
making a good faith complaint about the conditions of the residential premises and provides conditions by which a tenant may terminate a lease if a habitability issue is not remediated.
| House Sponsors | K. Brown (D) J. Mabrey (D) | Senate Sponsors | L. Cutter (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (05/12/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1255
|
Title: |
Regulating Local Housing Growth Restrictions |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/24/2023 | Description | Concerning preemption of local regulations limiting the number of building permits issued for development. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Gonzales (D) House: W. Lindstedt (D) R. Dickson (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/29/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
Overview
Colorado has a severe housing shortage and housing affordability crisis that impacts the entire state. To address the housing affordability crisis, Colorado needs to increase and diversify its housing stock statewide. Currently, several local governments have laws that restrict the growth of residential housing. HB23-1255 prohibits local governments from enforcing or enacting local housing growth restrictions. In the event of a declared disaster emergency, the local government may enact a temporary growth restriction for no more than one year after the disaster declaration. On April 5, 2023, HB23-1255 passed in the House Transportation, Housing & Local Government Committee, as amended, on a vote of 9-2. An amendment clarifies the definition of anti-growth law to be “a land use law that explicitly limits the number of land use applications made to or accepted by a governmental entity, the number of building permits submitted to or issued by a governmental entity, or the allowable population growth for residential or mixed-use developments or residential construction projects for any period.”
Fiscal Impact
No appropriation is required for this bill. By restricting local governments from enacting or enforcing local housing growth limits, the bill is expected to increase local property and sales tax revenue on net, though impacts may vary across the state.
League Positions
The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person and policies that provide equality of opportunity for education, employment, and housing for all persons. Additional LWVUS housing supply criteria include: (1) Regional and metropolitan planning should be promoted to prevent haphazard urban growth, and housing for low- and moderate-income families should be provided as a part of all planned neighborhoods or communities; (2) Lower income families should not be segregated in large developments or neighborhoods; and (3) Zoning practices and procedures that will counteract racial and economic isolation should be promoted. HB23-1255 is a Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) bill.
Supporting Information
Section 1 declarations in the bill state that:
(a) A RELIABLE PUBLIC POLICY ENVIRONMENT THAT SUPPORTS AN ADEQUATE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUPPLY IS A MATTER OF STATEWIDE CONCERN, AND A HEALTHY SUPPLY OF HOUSING UNITS TO MATCH BOTH CURRENT DEMAND AND FUTURE DEMAND DRIVEN BY POPULATION GROWTH IS CRITICAL FOR JOB CREATION, HOUSING STABILITY, AFFORDABILITY, AND THE OVERALL ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF ALL COLORADANS.
(b) THE LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN COLORADO IS DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE SCARCITY OF HOUSING UNITS.
(e) ANTI-GROWTH LAWS ENACTED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS SEVERELY UNDERMINE THE ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT THE ADDITIONAL HOUSING UNITS COLORADANS NEED.
(f) ANTI-GROWTH LAWS DO IRREPARABLE ECONOMIC HARM TO WORKING CLASS COLORADANS BY LIMITING THE HOUSING SUPPLY AND DRIVING UP HOUSING PRICES AND RENTS. FURTHERMORE, ANTI-GROWTH LAWS THREATEN THE LIVELIHOOD OF COLORADANS EMPLOYED IN CONSTRUCTION AND OTHER BUILDING TRADES AS WELL AS BUSINESSES ACROSS THE STATE THAT RELY ON THE COMMERCE ASSOCIATED WITH HOME BUILDING.
(g) UNIFORMITY IN LAND USE LAWS CONCERNING RESIDENTIAL GROWTH IS NECESSARY FOR EFFICIENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STATEWIDE AND FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION OF NEW HOUSING UNITS.
Analysis
Given that local anti-growth laws limit the production of housing and contribute to the scarcity of housing units and increased rent and for-sale home prices, League positions are in alignment with the statewide prohibition of local anti-growth laws. Anti-growth provisions are exclusionary, and scarcity and higher housing costs can result in housing cost-burdened households and discrimination against low- and moderate-income households, which disproportionately impacts people of color. There is a need for regulatory uniformity across the state to address our statewide housing crisis and to provide housing for a range of income levels. Under HB23-1255, local governments are not prevented from making decisions about specific developments or projects within their jurisdictions, and property owners are not required to build additional housing or new developments.
LWVCO Supports this bill.
| Summary | Currently, several local governments have laws restricting the
growth of residential housing. The bill declares that the state has an interest in encouraging housing growth statewide, preempts any existing local housing growth restriction, and forbids the enactment or enforcement of any future local housing growth restriction, unless the local government has experienced a disaster emergency.
| House Sponsors | W. Lindstedt (D) R. Dickson (D) | Senate Sponsors | J. Gonzales (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1257
|
Title: |
Mobile Home Park Water Quality |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/26/2023 | Description | Concerning water quality in mobile home parks, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment- Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) L. Cutter (D) House: A. Boesenecker (D) E. Velasco (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/10/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates a water testing program for mobile home parks
(parks). The testing program is developed and administered by the water quality control division (division) in the department of public health and environment (department). The bill also sets testing prioritization criteria and testing standards. If the testing reveals a water quality issue, the division will notify the following and include information about the test results, recommended actions, remediation, and the grant program established in the bill:
The park owner;
The county department of health or municipality where the park is located;
The water supplier; and
The environmental justice ombudsperson (ombudsperson).
Upon receiving the notice, the park owner must:
Notify the park residents;
Comply with orders of the division;
Not impose the cost of compliance on park residents;
Within 90 days after receiving the notice, prepare and submit to the division a remediation plan;
Complete the remediation plan based on a schedule approved by the division; and
Consult with the division and provide an alternative water supply or department-approved filters.
The division will coordinate with the division of housing in the
department of local affairs to identify potential money, including grant money from the grant program created in the bill, to support park water quality remediation.
The division will develop an action plan to address and improve
water quality in parks. Standards are established for the action plan, including environmental justice principles, and the development of the action plan.
The bill creates a grant program to help park owners and local
governments address water quality issues. The division will implement and administer the grant program. The general assembly will annually appropriate money to the department to fund the grant program.
The bill is enforced by the division, which may issue
cease-and-desist orders.
A violation of the bill is a violation of the Colorado Consumer
Protection Act, and the bill further establishes that:
If a park owner fails to develop a remediation plan or implement the remediation plan, the park will be declared a class 3 public nuisance, and the park owner must forfeit the park;
A park owner that fails to register under the Mobile Home Park Act Dispute Resolution and Enforcement Program violates the Colorado Consumer Protection Act; and
A person may bring a civil action under the Mobile Home Park Act.
A park that has been forfeited because it is a class 3 public
nuisance becomes the property of the county where the park is located, and the county will continue to operate the park to provide affordable housing for no fewer than 100 years. Penalties imposed under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act are deposited in a fund to be used
to provide grants through the grant program and for the division to administer and enforce the bill.
The ombudsperson is given the duty to represent park residents in
matters of water quality.
The bill adds water quality issues to the database created by the
Mobile Home Park Act Dispute Resolution and Enforcement Program, which tracks complaints filed against parks.
| House Sponsors | A. Boesenecker (D) E. Velasco (D) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) L. Cutter (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Finance | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1304
|
Title: |
Proposition 123 Affordable Housing Programs |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/20/2023 | Description | Concerning modifications to the affordable housing programs created by the voters' approval of proposition 123. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: T. Exum Sr. (D) D. Roberts (D) House: J. McCluskie (D) L. Frizell (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/27/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | At the general election in 2022, voters approved proposition 123,
which created new affordable housing programs funded with income tax revenue that the state is permitted to retain and spend as a voter-approved revenue change. 60% of the dedicated revenue is allocated to the affordable housing financing fund (financing fund) for 3 new affordable
housing programs. This money is continuously appropriated to the office of economic development (office), which is required to give the money to an administrator selected by the office to administer the programs. 40% of the dedicated revenue is allocated to the affordable housing support fund (support fund), which is continuously appropriated to the division of housing for 3 other affordable housing programs, including the land planning capacity development program.
Local governments that seek additional affordable housing funding
from these programs must commit to increasing the number of affordable housing units within the local government by 3% annually and expedite development approvals for affordable housing projects (conditions for funding). The funding for the new affordable housing programs is prohibited from supplanting existing state appropriations for affordable housing programs (maintenance of effort requirement).
The bill modifies the affordable housing programs by:
Allowing tribal governments to participate in the programs, subject to the same conditions for funding;
Requiring the division of local government, rather than the division of housing, to administer the land planning capacity development program and continuously appropriating money in the support fund to the division of local government for that purpose;
Allowing the office to use a portion of the money in the financing fund for its administrative expenses, without increasing the total amount of money from the fund that may be used for administrative expenses;
Clarifying that, for the affordable housing programs administered by the administrator, the area median income and rent levels are designated for each rental unit instead of being recalculated on a monthly basis and that the average area median income calculation does not apply to the modular and factory build manufacturer debt program;
Clarifying the description of how money is transferred or allocated;
For purposes of the 3% growth obligation that is a condition for funding, specifying that all units from projects funded through certain affordable housing programs are counted towards the obligation and allowing local governments and tribal governments to enter into a written agreement to divvy up the units that result from collaborative agreements;
Establishing a process for rural resort communities to petition the division of housing to use different percentages of area median income than those percentages specified for eligibility for certain affordable housing programs funded
through the financing fund;
Exempting money originally from the federal coronavirus state fiscal recovery fund from the appropriations for fiscal year 2022-23 that are used to determine the state's maintenance of effort requirement; and
Requiring the office and the division of housing to provide 3 annual reports to legislative committees about the affordable housing programs.
| House Sponsors | J. McCluskie (D) L. Frizell (R) | Senate Sponsors | T. Exum Sr. (D) D. Roberts (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-001
|
Title: |
Authority Of Public-private Collaboration Unit For Housing |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/09/2023 | Description | Concerning additional functions of the public-private collaboration unit for public projects that provide housing, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - State Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Zenzinger (D) D. Roberts (D) House: S. Bird (D) M. Lukens (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/01/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The public-private collaboration unit (unit) in the department of
personnel (department) promotes the use of public-private partnerships between state public entities such as departments, agencies, or subdivisions of the executive branch of state government, and private partners as a tool for time and cost-efficient completion of public
projects. The bill authorizes the unit to undertake additional functions in connection with public projects that provide housing including:
Accepting gifts, grants, and donations, which if monetary, are to be credited to the unused state-owned real property fund (fund);
Utilizing proceeds from real estate transactions and revenue from public-private agreements;
Acting as an agent on behalf of the department in real estate transactions using real property that upon approval by the governor has been deeded to the department by a state public entity, including for the purchase, transfer, exchange, sale and disposition, and lease of real property; and
Establishing a process for using requests for information to solicit public projects.
The bill also allows the department and the unit to use money from
the fund to facilitate these additional functions by the unit in connection with public projects that provide housing and for the standard operating expenses of the unit.
| House Sponsors | S. Bird (D) M. Lukens (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Zenzinger (D) D. Roberts (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (05/20/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-035
|
Title: |
Middle-income Housing Authority Act |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/10/2023 | Description | Concerning the operation of the middle-income housing authority, and, in connection therewith, adding members to the board of directors, expanding the power of the authority to enter into public-private partnerships, and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing- Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Moreno (D) J. Bridges (D) House: L. Herod (D) J. Joseph (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (09/07/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Under current law, the middle-income housing authority
(authority) has the power to make and enter into contracts or agreements
with public or private entities to facilitate public-private partnerships. The bill clarifies this power of the authority to enter into public-private partnerships by specifying that:
The affordable rental housing component of a public-private partnership is exempt from state and local taxation;
A public-private partnership may provide for the transfer of the interest in an affordable rental housing project to an entity other than the authority;
The authority may issue bonds to finance the affordable rental housing component in a public-private partnership; and
Bonds issued by the authority may be payable from the revenue and assets of the affordable rental housing component of a public-private partnership or solely from the revenue or assets of the authority as current law requires.
Additionally, the bill expands the board of directors of the
authority from 14 to 16 by adding 2 nonvoting members. The senate majority leader and the house majority leader will each appoint a member of the general assembly from their respective chambers to serve as the 2 new nonvoting members, unless the senate majority leader and the house majority leader are from the same political party in which case the house minority leader will appoint the member to the board of directors from the house.
| House Sponsors | L. Herod (D) J. Joseph (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Moreno (D) J. Bridges (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/02/2023) | Amendments | - April 26, 2023: Legislative Council Committee Report
- April 14, 2023: House Appropriations Committee Report
- March 29, 2023: House Transportation, Housing & Local Government Committee Report
- March 29, 2023: House Transportation, Housing & Local Government Committee Report
- February 17, 2023: Senate Appropriations Committee Report
- February 17, 2023: Senate Appropriations Committee Report
- January 26, 2023: L.001 Senate Local Government & Housing Committee
- January 26, 2023: Senate Local Government & Housing Committee Report
- January 26, 2023: Senate Local Government & Housing Committee Report
|
|
Bill:
SB23-082
|
Title: |
Colorado Fostering Success Voucher Program |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/27/2023 | Description | Concerning creation of the Colorado fostering success voucher program to assist foster youth, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Children & Domestic Matters- Housing- Human Services | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Zenzinger (D) B. Kirkmeyer (R) House: D. Michaelson Jenet (D) J. Amabile (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/31/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
SB23 082 establishes the Colorado fostering success voucher program in the Department of Human Services (DHS). The purpose of the program is to provide housing vouchers and case management services to eligible youth. Case management services agencies are eligible to participate in the program if they are currently participating in a certain type of foster youth program. Eligibility criteria for youth include: * Being at least 18 years of age but less than 26 years of age; * Having had prior experience in one of several ways with the foster care or kinship care system; * Experiencing homelessness or being imminent risk of homelessness and agreeing to receive case management services; * Being a Colorado resident; and * Having an income level below that determined by the State Department of Local Affairs (DOLA).
DHS and DOLA shall develop a joint administration and implementation plan for the program. Availability, standards, and services for the program are listed in the bill.
When child welfare cases are closed and out-of-home care has ended and they have no family to return to, the ultimate goal is to provide the child/youth, with a permanent home. The Denver Post in an article updated in 2019, stated that over the previous 5 years, 1,513 young people ages 17-21 have emancipated from Colorado’s foster care system called “aging out” but Colorado allows foster youth to stay in the system until age 21 but only a fraction of foster teens are choosing to remain in the system past 18.
The LWVCO supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person. The LWVCO is fully committed to Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) to create a more perfect democracy.
| Summary | The bill establishes the Colorado fostering success voucher
program (program) in the department of human services (DHS). The purpose of the program is to provide housing vouchers and case management services to eligible youth.
Case management service agencies are eligible to participate in the
program if they are currently participating in a certain type of foster youth
program.
Eligibility criteria for youth include:
Being at least 18 years of age but less than 26 years of age;
Having had prior experience in one of several ways with the foster care or kinship care system;
Experiencing homelessness or being at imminent risk of homelessness and agreeing to receive case management services;
Being a Colorado resident; and
Having an income level below that determined by the state department of local affairs (DOLA).
DHS and DOLA shall develop a joint administration and
implementation plan for the program. Availability, standards, and services for the program are listed in the bill.
| House Sponsors | D. Michaelson Jenet (D) J. Amabile (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Zenzinger (D) B. Kirkmeyer (R) | House Committee | Public and Behavioral Health & Human Services | Senate Committee | Health and Human Services | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-184
|
Title: |
Protections For Residential Tenants |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/09/2023 | Description | Concerning protections for residential tenants, and, in connection therewith, prohibiting a landlord from considering certain information relating to a prospective tenant's income or rental history, establishing a maximum amount that a landlord can require as a security deposit, and allowing a tenant to assert as an affirmative defense in an eviction proceeding that a landlord violated anti-discriminatory housing laws. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) T. Exum Sr. (D) House: M. Froelich (D) L. Garcia (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/31/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary |
League position supports policies to provide a decent home and a suitable living environment for every person.
The cost of housing in Colorado has skyrocketed and renters are frequently spending a greater share of their income on housing. The housing market has not adjusted to these realities and many are denied housing because of rental screening criteria.
The following guardrails would help expanding access to housing: -people with housing subsidy should no longer be disqualified based on amount of private income and credit score as this vetting has already been done. -renter would need to demonstrate earnings of at least 1.25x the cost of rent. -ensure that fair housing violations can be raised as an affirmative defense to an eviction -limit security deposit to one month’s rent and could be paid in monthly installments -enter into rental agreement with the first applicant who applies and meets financial and other rental screening criteria -provide time-stamped receipts of application upon applicant request.
LWVCO is Monitoring this bill.
| Summary | Section 1 of the bill restricts a landlord from considering or
inquiring about certain information relating to a prospective tenant's rental history, amount of income, and credit history. Section 1 also requires a landlord who solicits and accepts rental applications for the rental of a residential premises to rent to the first prospective tenant who applies and satisfies the landlord's financial and other rental screening criteria. A landlord must keep records of when rental applications are received and provide a time-stamped receipt to any prospective tenant who submits a rental application and requests such a receipt.
Section 2 defines the terms amount of income and housing
subsidy for the purposes of the bill.
Section 3 states that a landlord who violates any of the bill's new
prohibitions is subject to an initial penalty of $50, to be paid to the aggrieved party. A landlord who does not cure the violation is also subject to a statutory penalty of $5,000, to be paid to the aggrieved party in addition to the initial penalty and any economic damages, court costs, and attorney fees.
Sections 1 and 4 establish that a violation of any of the bill's new
prohibitions is an unfair housing practice subject to enforcement by private persons, the attorney general, and the Colorado civil rights division.
Section 5 requires a landlord to allow a tenant to pay a security
deposit in monthly installments over a period that is equal to half the term of the tenancy. Section 5 also prohibits a landlord from requiring a tenant to submit a security deposit in an amount that exceeds the amount of one monthly rent payment under the rental agreement.
Sections 6 and 7 establish that a tenant who alleges that the
tenant's landlord has violated or is in violation of any state laws concerning unfair housing practices has an affirmative defense against an eviction action.
| House Sponsors | M. Froelich (D) L. Garcia (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) T. Exum Sr. (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (06/06/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-213
|
Title: |
Land Use |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/22/2023 | Description | Concerning state land use requirements, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Housing- Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Moreno (D) House: S. Woodrow (D) I. Jodeh (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/10/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Housing needs planning. The executive director of the
department of local affairs (director) shall, no later than December 31, 2024, and every 5 years thereafter, issue methodology for developing statewide, regional, and local housing needs assessments. The statewide housing needs assessment must determine existing statewide housing stock and current and future housing needs. The regional housing needs assessments must allocate the addressing of housing needs identified in the statewide housing needs assessment to regions of the state. Similarly, the local housing needs assessments must allocate the addressing of the housing needs allocated in the regional housing needs assessment to localities in the relevant region.
The director shall, no later than December 31, 2024, issue
guidance on creating a housing needs plan for both a rural resort job center municipality and an urban municipality. Following this guidance, no later than December 31, 2026, and every 5 years thereafter, a rural resort job center municipality and an urban municipality shall develop a housing needs plan and submit that plan to the department of local affairs (department). A housing needs plan must include, among other things, descriptions of how the plan was created, how the municipality will address the housing needs it was assigned in the local housing needs assessment, affordability strategies the municipality has selected to address its local housing needs assessment, an assessment of
displacement risk and any strategies selected to address identified risks, and how the locality will comply with other housing requirements in this bill.
The director shall, no later than December 31, 2024, develop and
publish a menu of affordability strategies to address housing production, preservation, and affordability. Rural resort job center municipalities and urban municipalities shall identify at least 2 of these strategies that they intend to implement in their housing plan, and urban municipalities with a transit-oriented area must identify at least 3.
The director shall, no later than December 31, 2024, develop and
publish a menu of displacement mitigation measures. This menu must, among other things, provide guidance for how to identify areas at the highest risk for displacement and identify displacement mitigation measures that a locality may adopt. An urban municipality must identify which of these measures it intends to implement in its housing plan to address any areas it identifies as at an elevated risk for displacement.
The director shall, no later than March 31, 2024, publish a report
that identifies strategic growth objectives that will incentivize growth in transit-oriented areas and infill areas and guide growth at the edges of urban areas. The multi-agency advisory committee shall, no later than March 31, 2024, submit a report to the general assembly concerning the strategic growth objectives.
The bill establishes a multi-agency advisory committee and
requires that committee to conduct a public comment and hearing process on and provide recommendations to the director on:
Methodologies for developing statewide, regional, and local housing needs assessments;
Guidance for creating housing needs plans;
Developing a menu of affordability strategies;
Developing a menu of displacement mitigation measures;
Identifying strategic growth objectives; and
Developing reporting guidance and templates.
A county or municipality within a rural resort region shall
participate in a regional housing needs planning process. This process must encourage participating counties and municipalities to identify strategies that, either individually or through intergovernmental agreements, address the housing needs assigned to them. A report on this process must be submitted to the department. Further, within 6 months of completing this process, a rural resort job center municipality shall submit a local housing needs plan to the department. Once a year, both rural resort job centers and urban municipalities shall report to the department on certain housing data.
A multi-agency group created in the bill and the division of local
government within the department shall provide assistance to localities in complying with the requirements of this bill. This assistance must
include technical assistance and a grant program.
Accessory dwelling units. The director shall promulgate an
accessory dwelling unit model code that, among other things, requires accessory dwelling units to be allowed as a use by right in any part of a municipality where the municipality allows single-unit detached dwellings as a use by right. The committee shall provide recommendations to the director for promulgating this model code. In developing these recommendations, the committee shall conduct a public comment and hearing process.
Even if a municipality does not adopt the accessory dwelling unit
model code, the municipality shall adhere to accessory dwelling unit minimum standards established in the bill and by the department. These minimum standards, among other things, must require a municipality to:
Allow accessory dwelling units as a use by right in any part of the municipality where the municipality allows single-unit detached dwellings as a use by right;
Only adopt or enforce local laws concerning accessory dwelling units that use objective standards and procedures;
Not adopt, enact, or enforce local laws concerning accessory dwelling units that are more restrictive than local laws concerning single-unit detached dwellings; and
Not apply standards that make the permitting, siting, or construction of accessory dwelling units infeasible.
Middle housing. The director shall promulgate a middle housing
model code that, among other things, requires middle housing to be allowed as a use by right in any part of a rural resort job center municipality or a tier one urban municipality where the municipality allows single-unit detached dwellings as a use by right. The committee shall provide recommendations to the director for promulgating this model code. In developing these recommendations, the committee shall conduct a public comment and hearing process.
Even if a rural resort job center municipality or a tier one urban
municipality does not adopt the middle housing model code, the municipality shall adhere to middle housing minimum standards established in the bill and by the department. These minimum standards, among other things, must require a municipality to:
Allow middle housing as a use by right in certain areas;
Only adopt or enforce local laws concerning middle housing that use objective standards and procedures;
Allow properties on which middle housing is allowed to be split by right using objective standards and procedures;
Not adopt, enact, or enforce local laws concerning middle housing that are more restrictive than local laws concerning single-unit detached dwellings; and
Not apply standards that make the permitting, siting, or
construction of middle housing infeasible.
Transit-oriented areas. The director shall promulgate a
transit-oriented area model code that, among other things, imposes minimum residential density limits for multifamily residential housing and mixed-income multifamily residential housing and allows these developments as a use by right in the transit-oriented areas of tier one urban municipalities. The committee shall provide recommendations to the director for promulgating this model code. In developing these recommendations, the committee shall conduct a public comment and hearing process.
Even if a tier one urban municipality does not adopt the
transit-oriented model code, the municipality shall adhere to middle housing minimum standards established in the bill and by the department. These minimum standards, among other things, must require a municipality to:
Create a zoning district within a transit-oriented area in which multifamily housing meets a minimum residential density limit and is allowed as a use by right; and
Not apply standards that make the permitting, siting, or construction of multifamily housing in transit-oriented areas infeasible.
Key corridors. The director shall promulgate a key corridor model
code that applies to key corridors in rural resort job center municipalities and tier one urban municipalities. The model code must, among other things, include requirements for:
The percentage of units in mixed-income multifamily residential housing that must be reserved for low- and moderate-income households;
Minimum residential density limits for multifamily residential housing; and
Mixed-income multifamily residential housing that must be allowed as a use by right in key corridors.
The committee shall provide recommendations to the director for promulgating this model code. In developing these recommendations, the committee shall conduct a public comment and hearing process.
Even if a rural resort job center municipality or a tier one urban
municipality does not adopt the key corridor model code, the municipality shall adhere to key corridor minimum standards promulgated by the director and developed by the department. These minimum standards, among other things, must identify a net residential zoning capacity for a municipality and must require a municipality to:
Allow multifamily residential housing within key corridors that meets the net residential zoning capacity as a use by right;
Not apply standards that make the permitting, siting, or
construction of multifamily housing in certain areas infeasible; and
Not adopt, enact, or enforce local laws that make satisfying the required minimum residential density limits infeasible.
The committee shall provide recommendations to the director on promulgating these minimum standards. In developing these recommendations, the committee shall conduct a public comment and hearing process.
Adoption of model codes and minimum standards. A relevant
municipality shall adopt either the model code or local laws that satisfy the minimum standards concerning accessory dwelling units, middle housing, transit-oriented areas, and key corridors. Furthermore, a municipality shall submit a report to the department demonstrating that it has done so. If a municipality fails to adopt either the model code or local laws that satisfy the minimum standards by a specified deadline, the relevant model code immediately goes into effect, and municipalities shall then approve any proposed projects that meet the standards in the model code using objective procedures. However, a municipality may apply to the department for a deadline extension for a deficiency in water or wastewater infrastructure or supply.
Additional provisions. The bill also:
Requires the advisory committee on factory-built structures and tiny homes to produce a report on the opportunities and barriers in state law concerning the building of manufactured homes, mobile homes, and tiny homes;
Removes the requirements that manufacturers of factory-built structures comply with escrow requirements of down payments and provide a letter of credit, certificate of deposit issued by a licensed financial institution, or surety bond issued by an authorized insurer;
Prohibits a planned unit development resolution or ordinance for a planned unit with a residential use from restricting accessory dwelling units, middle housing, housing in transit-oriented areas, or housing in key corridors in a way not allowed by this bill;
Prohibits a local government from enacting or enforcing residential occupancy limits that differ based on the relationships of the occupants of a dwelling;
Modifies the content requirements for a county and municipal master plan, requires counties and municipalities to adopt or amend master plans as part of an inclusive process, and requires counties and municipalities to submit master plans to the department;
Allows a municipality to sell and dispose of real property and public buildings for the purpose of providing property
to be used as affordable housing, without requiring the sale to be submitted to the voters of the municipality;
Requires the approval process for manufactured and modular homes to be based on objective standards and administrative review equivalent to the approval process for site-built homes;
Prohibits a municipality from imposing more restrictive standards on manufactured and modular homes than the municipality imposes on site-built homes;
Prohibits certain municipalities from imposing minimum square footage requirements for residential units in the approval of residential dwelling unit construction permits;
Requires certain entities to submit to the Colorado water conservation board (board) a completed and validated water loss audit report pursuant to guidelines that the board shall adopt;
Allows the board to make grants from the water efficiency grant program cash fund to provide water loss audit report validation assistance to covered entities;
Allows the board and the Colorado water resources and power development authority to consider whether an entity has submitted a required audit report in deciding whether to release financial assistance to the entity for the construction of a water diversion, storage, conveyance, water treatment, or wastewater treatment facility;
Prohibits a unit owners' association from restricting accessory dwelling units, middle housing, housing in transit-oriented areas, or housing in key corridors;
Requires the department of transportation to ensure that the prioritization criteria for any grant program administered by the department are consistent with state strategic growth objectives, so long as doing so does not violate federal law;
Requires any regional transportation plan that is created or updated to address and ensure consistency with state strategic growth objectives;
Requires that expenditures for local and state multimodal projects from the multimodal transportation options fund are only to be made for multimodal projects that the department determines are consistent with state strategic growth objectives; and
For state fiscal year 2023-24, appropriates $15,000,000 from the general fund to the housing plans assistance fund and makes the department responsible for the accounting related to the appropriation.
1
| House Sponsors | S. Woodrow (D) I. Jodeh (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Moreno (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Senate Considered House Amendments - Result was to Laid Over Daily (05/06/2023) | Amendments | |
|
|