Bill Tracker
based on: Profile: GreenCO
Loading... Please Wait
You have 31 bills in your selected Profile
download to spreadsheet download to docx
Notes about this profile:
Bill:
HB25-1001
|
Title: |
Enforcement Wage Hour Laws |
Position | Amend | Status | House Committee on Appropriations Refer Amended to House Committee of the Whole (03/25/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the enforcement of wage and hour laws. | Background | | Summary | Section 1 of the bill amends the definition of employer for
purposes of wage and hour laws to include an individual who owns or controls at least 25% of the ownership interest in an employer.
Section 2 prohibits an employer from making a payroll deduction
below a worker's applicable minimum wage.
Section 3 allows the director of the division of labor standards and
statistics (division) to waive the penalty for an employer's failure to pay claimed wages or compensation within 14 days after a written demand if
certain specified conditions are met.
Section 4 repeals language allowing a court to award an employer
reasonable costs and attorney fees in a civil action for unpaid wages or compensation in certain circumstances. In such an action, the court may pursue all equitable relief to deter future violations and prevent unjust enrichment.
Current law limits the ability of the director of the division to
adjudicate claims for nonpayment of wages or compensation to $7,500 or less. Section 5 increases this threshold over the years by increasing the amount to $13,000 for claims filed from July 1, 2026, through December 31, 2027, and in an amount specified by the director of the division to adjust for inflation beginning January 1, 2028. Section 5 also requires the division, in adjudicating wage claims, to determine whether a violation is willful. For each violation:
The director shall publish on the division's website the names of all employers found to be in violation and whether the violation was willful; and
If the violation is not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding that there was a violation, the division must notify all government bodies with the authority to deny, withdraw, or otherwise limit or impose remedial conditions on the employer's license, permit, registration, or other credential.
Additionally, the division may report an employer found to have
violated a law related to wages and hours to any government body with authority to deny, withdraw, or otherwise limit or impose remedial conditions on a license, permit, registration, or other credential that the violating employer has or may seek. Section 5 also repeals language requiring the division to issue a determination on a wage complaint within 90 days.
Section 6 requires an employer found to have misclassified an
employee as a nonemployee to pay a fine in the following amounts, in addition to any other relief ordered:
For a willful violation, $5,000;
For a violation not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding, $10,000;
For a second or subsequent willful violation within 5 years, $25,000; or
For a second or subsequent willful violation not remedied within 60 days after the division's finding, $50,000.
The director of the division must adjust these fine amounts for
inflation by January 1, 2028, and every other year thereafter.
Section 6 also decreases the amount of time the division must wait
before paying an employee out of the wage theft enforcement fund from 6 months to 120 days.
Current law prohibits an employer from discriminating or
retaliating against an employee for taking protection under wage and hour laws or the law related to the employment of minors. Section 7 expands this provision to specify additional protected behavior and expands the prohibition to include other persons in addition to employers.
Section 7 also:
Requires a fact finder to consider the time between an individual's exercise of a protected activity and an employer's adverse action when determining whether an employer has retaliated against the employee or worker;
Specifies that any effort to use an individual's immigration status to negatively impact the wage and hour law rights, responsibilities, or proceedings of any employee or worker is an unlawful act of intimidation, threatening, coercion, discrimination, and retaliation; and
Allows the division to order reasonable attorney fees and costs after investigating a discrimination or retaliation claim.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | M. Froelich (D) M. Duran (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | J. Danielson (D) C. Kolker (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/04/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1010
|
Title: |
Prohibiting Price Gouging in Sales of Necessities |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Business, Labor, & Technology (03/13/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning a prohibition against engaging in price gouging. | Background | | Summary | Under current law, a person engages in an unfair and
unconscionable act or practice in violation of consumer protection laws (unfair act) if the person engages in price gouging during a declared disaster. The bill adds engaging in price gouging in the sale of necessities as an unfair act and creates a presumption that, if the price of a necessity is increased by 10% or more above the average price that the necessity cost during the 90 days preceding the price increase, the price increase amounts to price gouging.
The bill also defines necessities as goods or services that are
necessary for the health, safety, and welfare of consumers or of the general public.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | K. Brown (D) Y. Zokaie (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | M. Weissman (D) | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/14/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1014
|
Title: |
Increasing Efficiency Division of Water Resources |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources (03/10/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning measures to increase efficiency in division of water resources processes. | Background | | Summary | The division of water resources in the department of natural
resources (division) is responsible for administering water rights and issuing water well permits, among other duties.
Under current law, after having received a permit to appropriate
designated groundwater or construct a well outside the boundaries of a designated groundwater basin, a permit holder is required to construct the
well within one year after the date of issuance of the permit. If the well is not constructed within one year, the permit expires; except that the ground water commission (commission) in the division or the state engineer, as applicable, may grant a single one-year extension.
The bill extends the time frame for construction of a well to 2
years, eliminating the need for the commission or the state engineer to approve a one-year extension to the initial one-year construction time frame, except for permits issued for federally authorized water projects. The bill also removes the requirement that the commission or state engineer must mail a certified letter to the permit holder before a permit can be formally expired. The bill allows the commission or state engineer to reinstate an expired permit if the applicant for reinstatement of the permit can show that the well was completed in a timely manner and submits a $30 fee.
Under current law, the division engineer of each water division is
required to decennially present to the water court a list of water rights that meet the criteria for abandonment. The bill splits this decennial abandonment process into 2 batches, grouped by water division and spaced 5 years apart, beginning with 2030 and 2035. The bill maintains the requirement that the abandonment process be performed every 10 years in each water division.
The bill extends certain time frames relating to the well permitting
process. Lastly, the bill eliminates final permitting requirements for non-Denver Basin bedrock aquifer wells in the designated basins.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | M. Lukens (D) D. Johnson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/13/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1030
|
Title: |
Accessibility Standards in Building Codes |
Position | Monitor | Status | Governor Signed (03/11/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the requirement that certain building codes have accessibility standards that are at least as stringent as international building codes. | Background | | Summary | Beginning January 1, 2026, the bill requires a local government
that adopts or substantially amends a building code to ensure that the building code meets or exceeds the accessibility standards in international building codes.
The bill also requires the division of fire prevention and control
within the department of public safety to ensure that, when certain building codes pertaining to public school and heath facilities are substantially amended, the codes meet or exceed accessibility standards in international building codes.
The bill requires the state housing board to ensure that, when the
uniform construction and maintenance standards for hotels, motels, and multiple dwellings in jurisdictions with no local building code are substantially updated, the standards meet or exceed the accessibility standards in international building codes. The bill also requires the state housing board to ensure that, when the recommendations for uniform housing standards and building codes to the general assembly and local governments are substantially updated, the codes meet or exceed the accessibility standards in international building codes.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | J. Joseph (D) R. Stewart (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) L. Cutter (D) | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/28/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1042
|
Title: |
Air Quality Control Regulation Workforce Impact |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Committee on Energy & Environment Refer Amended to Appropriations (02/27/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the establishment of a workforce advisory council to consider air quality control rules that impact workforce issues in affected industries. | Background | | Summary | The bill requires the executive director of the department of public
health and environment (department) to establish a workforce advisory council (council) on or before August 1, 2025, for the purposes of:
Discussing recommendations concerning the incorporation of workforce impact analyses into the rule-making
procedures for rules that impact air quality;
Recommending standard procedures for the department and the air quality control commission (commission) to follow when conducting workforce impact analyses for inclusion in rule-making procedures; and
Determining if the establishment of a full-time workforce advocate position would add value to the air quality control rule-making process.
The bill requires the department to report the council's
recommendations to the general assembly on or before January 15, 2026.
After January 15, 2026, the council is required to:
Meet at least 4 times per year;
Continue to advise the department on the impact of proposed air quality control rules on matters related to employment; and
Make ongoing recommendations to the governor, the department, and the commission on legislative and regulatory air quality control policies that impact employment matters.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | S. Bird (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Sponsors | L. Daugherty (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/24/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1077
|
Title: |
Backflow Prevention Devices Requirements |
Position | Support | Status | Sent to the Governor (03/20/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning requirements for individuals who work on backflow prevention devices, and, in connection therewith, removing the licensure requirement for individuals who inspect, test, or repair the devices. | Background | | Summary | Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee.
Backflow is the reverse flow of water, fluid, or gas caused by back pressure or back siphonage. Under current law, individuals who are
engaged in the business of installing, removing, inspecting, testing, or repairing backflow prevention devices are subject to the licensure requirements for plumbers, except when the individuals are installing or testing a stand-alone fire suppression sprinkler system.
The bill exempts individuals engaged in the business of inspecting,
testing, or repairing backflow prevention devices from licensure requirements but retains the licensure requirements for individuals engaged in the installation or removal of the devices.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | N. Ricks (D) S. Lieder (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) J. Rich (R) | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/17/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1090
|
Title: |
Protections Against Deceptive Pricing Practices |
Position | Monitor | Status | Senate Second Reading Passed with Amendments - Committee, Floor (03/25/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning protections against deceptive pricing practices. | Background | | Summary | Section 2 of the bill:
Prohibits a person from offering, displaying, or advertising pricing information for a good, service, or property unless the person discloses the maximum total (total price) of all amounts that a person may pay for the good, service, or property, not including a government charge or shipping charge (total price disclosure requirement);
Prohibits a person from misrepresenting the nature and
purpose of pricing information for a good, service, or property;
Requires a person to disclose the nature and purpose of pricing information for a good, service, or property that is not part of the total price; and
Prohibits a landlord from requiring a tenant to pay certain fees, charges, or amounts.
A person does not violate the total price disclosure requirement if
the person does not use deceptive, unfair, and unconscionable acts or practices related to the pricing of goods, services, or property and if the person:
Is a food and beverage service establishment that:
Includes a disclosure in the total price for a good or service the amount of any mandatory service charge and how the mandatory service charge is distributed; and
Distributes any mandatory service charge exclusively to nonmanagerial employees in accordance with applicable laws; or
Can demonstrate that the person is governed by and compliant with applicable federal law regarding pricing transparency.
A violation of the above prohibitions and requirement (violation)
constitutes a deceptive, unfair, and unconscionable act or practice.
Section 2 also, along with any other remedies available by law or
in equity, allows a person aggrieved by a violation to bring a civil action and send a written demand for the violation. If a person declines to make full legal tender of all fees, charges, amounts, or damages demanded or refuses to cease charging the aggrieved person within 14 days after receiving the written demand, the person is liable for the greater of:
3 times the actual damages incurred; or
At least $100 to no more than $1,000 per person per violation.
Current law prohibits a written rental agreement from including a
provision requiring a tenant to pay a markup or fee for a service for which the landlord is billed by a third party. Section 3 changes that provision to prohibit the inclusion of a provision in a written rental agreement that requires a tenant to pay a fee that is a violation.
| Hearing Date | 03/25/2025 | House Sponsors | N. Ricks (D) E. Sirota (D) | House Committee | Judiciary | Senate Sponsors | M. Weissman (D) L. Cutter (D) | Senate Committee | Judiciary | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/10/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1093
|
Title: |
Limitations on Local Anti-Growth Land Use Policies |
Position | Monitor | Status | Signed by the President of the Senate (03/25/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning limitations on local land use policies that impose conditions that limit growth. | Background | | Summary | Current law preempts any local governmental entity housing
growth restriction (anti-growth law) that explicitly limits the growth of the population in the local governmental entity's jurisdiction or the number of development permits or building permit applications for residential development unless it is a temporary, nonrenewable anti-growth law following a declared disaster emergency.
The bill clarifies that an anti-growth law also includes any
restriction that explicitly seeks to impose additional restrictions or limitations on a particular housing type that exceed a governmental entity's zoning or building codes.
The bill also clarifies when a local government must provide the
option of paying a fee in lieu of land dedication for a private property owner whose property does not meet the local government's standards for dedication.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | R. Stewart (D) C. Barron (R) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | N. Hinrichsen (D) M. Ball (D) | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/25/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1113
|
Title: |
Limit Turf in New Residential Development |
Position | Amend | Status | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources (03/06/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning limiting the use of certain landscaping practices in new residential development. | Background | | Summary | In the 2024 regular legislative session, the general assembly
enacted Senate Bill 24-005, which:
Prohibits a local entity, on and after January 1, 2026, from installing, planting, or placing, or allowing any person to install, plant, or place, any nonfunctional turf, artificial turf, or invasive plant species, as part of a new development
project or redevelopment project, on any portion of applicable property within the local entity's jurisdiction; and
Requires a local entity, on or before January 1, 2026, to enact or amend ordinances, resolutions, regulations, or other laws regulating new development projects and redevelopment projects on applicable property in accordance with the new requirements.
For the purposes of Senate Bill 24-005, the bill expands the
definition of applicable property to include residential real property that is used for apartment or condominium housing (applicable residential real property).
The bill also requires each local entity to enact or amend, on or
before January 1, 2028, ordinances, resolutions, regulations, or other laws regulating new development projects and redevelopment projects within the local entity's jurisdiction to limit the installation of turf for all residential real property that is not applicable residential real property. Local entities must also impose limits on the installation of turf when enacting or amending ordinances, resolutions, regulations, or other laws on and after January 1, 2028.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | L. Smith (D) K. McCormick (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/03/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1115
|
Title: |
Water Supply Measurement & Forecasting Program |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Agriculture & Natural Resources (03/06/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the Colorado water conservation board's administration of a water supply measurement program, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | Background | | Summary | The bill authorizes the Colorado water conservation board (board)
to administer a water supply measurement and forecasting program to collect and disseminate data on snowpack levels, investigate technological advances in snowpack measurement and water supply forecasting, and collect other data that the board determines will assist in
those efforts.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | J. McCluskie (D) M. Soper (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Sponsors | M. Catlin (R) D. Roberts (D) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/05/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1121
|
Title: |
Permanent Trailer Registration |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Committee on Finance Refer Amended to Appropriations (02/27/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning an option to register a trailer until it is transferred to another person. | Background | | Summary | The bill authorizes the owner of a trailer to register the trailer for
as long as the person owns the trailer. The trailer must be class B or class C personal property. To register the trailer, the owner must pay:
10 years of specific ownership tax; and
$24.50 to cover fees.
Upon the transfer of ownership of the trailer, the owner is required
to notify the department of revenue of the transfer. The department will notify the owner of this requirement. If the owner fails to make the notification, the department may suspend the person's authority to register a trailer under the bill for 3 years. Procedures are set for implementing the suspension.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | L. Suckla (R) | House Committee | Finance | Senate Sponsors | | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/13/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1123
|
Title: |
Homeowners' Association Alternative Dispute Resolution |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments (02/28/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning alternative dispute resolution for disputes that arise between a unit owner and a unit owners' association. | Background | | Summary | Under current law, common interest communities are encouraged
to use mediation prior to filing a complaint with the court. The bill requires a dispute between a unit owner and a unit owners' association to go through an internal dispute resolution process and mediation before the parties can file a complaint with the court. If the parties are unable to
reach a mediation agreement, the bill allows the parties to undergo arbitration or commence a legal proceeding.
| Hearing Date | 03/25/2025 | House Sponsors | N. Ricks (D) J. Joseph (D) | House Committee | Judiciary | Senate Sponsors | | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/11/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1169
|
Title: |
Housing Developments on Faith and Educational Land |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In Senate - Assigned to Local Government & Housing (03/20/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the promotion of residential development on qualifying properties. | Background | | Summary | The bill requires a subject jurisdiction, on or after December 31,
2026, to allow a residential development to be constructed on a qualifying property that does not contain an exempt parcel, subject to an administrative approval process.
The bill specifies that a subject jurisdiction shall not:
Disallow construction of a residential development on the
basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development is no more than 3 stories or 45 feet tall;
Disallow construction of a residential development on the basis of height if the tallest structure in the residential development complies with the height-related standards for the zoning district in which the residential development will be built or any zoning district that is contiguous to the qualifying property on which the residential development will be built;
Disallow construction of a residential development based on the number of dwelling units that the residential development will contain, except in accordance with standards listed in the bill; or
Apply standards to a residential development on a qualifying property that are more restrictive than the standards the subject jurisdiction applies to similar housing constructed within the subject jurisdiction, including standards related to structure setbacks from property lines; lot coverage or open space; on-site parking requirements; numbers of bedrooms in a multifamily residential development; or on-site landscaping, screening, and buffering requirements.
A subject jurisdiction shall allow the following uses in a
residential development on a qualifying property:
Childcare; and
The provision of recreational, social, or educational services provided by community organizations for use by the residents of the residential development and the surrounding community.
A subject jurisdiction may condition additional uses in a residential
development on the uses being allowed only on the ground floor of the residential development and the uses occupying no more than 15% of the ground floor area of the residential development.
The bill requires a faith-based organization, school district, or state
college or university to notify the county assessor that a subject jurisdiction has allowed the construction of a residential development on a qualifying property within the county.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | A. Boesenecker (D) J. Mabrey (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | T. Exum Sr. (D) J. Gonzales (D) | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/14/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1211
|
Title: |
Tap Fees Imposed by Special Districts |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Third Reading Passed - No Amendments (03/17/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the provision of water service by special districts, and, in connection therewith, requiring a special district to satisfy certain requirements when establishing the amount of a tap fee. | Background | | Summary | A tap fee is a fee that is paid by a developer or property owner in
order to connect a property to a public water or sewer system. Current law allows the board (board) of any sanitation, water and sanitation, or water
district (water district) to impose and set the amount of a tap fee.
The bill states that a board has a duty to provide water service if
the water district has the capacity to do so. The bill also requires a board, in determining the amount of a tap fee, to:
Ensure that the amount of the tap fee is reasonably related to the costs incurred by the water district in providing water service, which may include costs relating to the acquisition of water rights; and
Take into consideration as supporting a reduced or proportional tap fee at least 2 of the following factors:
Expected long-term water usage, both indoor and outdoor;
The square footage of the unit;
The presence of low-water-usage appliances, if applicable;
The number of bedrooms and bathrooms; and
The presence of graywater treatment works, if applicable.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | S. Lieder (D) R. Stewart (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/14/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1261
|
Title: |
Consumers Construction Defect Action |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Committee on Transportation, Housing & Local Government Postpone Indefinitely (03/18/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning protections for homeowners that relate to improvements to real property. | Background | | Summary | In an action against a construction professional, section 2 of the
bill requires the construction professional to provide the claimant or the claimant's legal representative with:
Copies of all plans, specifications, soils reports, and available engineering calculations;
Any maintenance and preventive maintenance
recommendations;
The name, last-known address, and scope of work of each construction professional that performed work or services; and
Copies of all insurance policies held by the construction professional during the appropriate time.
The construction professional may charge reasonable copying costs for the documents. Failure to provide the identifying information of the other construction professionals bars the construction professional from designating the unidentified construction professionals as nonparties at fault in any subsequent action.
Section 3 requires a court to award prejudgement interest of 8%
to a prevailing claimant who alleges defects in a residential property construction.
Section 5 voids a provision in a real estate contract that:
Prohibits group lawsuits against a construction professional; or
Imposes different or additional requirements than the statutory requirements to bring or join a legal action.
Section 6 changes the time when a claim of relief arises, for the
purposes of the statute of limitation and repose, to include both the discovery of the physical manifestation and the cause of the defect.
Current law authorizes, subject to the requirements of the common
interest community's (community) declarations, a community to engage in certain actions, such as instituting, defending, or intervening in litigation or administrative proceedings on matters affecting the community. Section 7 exempts an association's authority to institute, defend, or intervene in litigation proceedings concerning construction defects from the requirement that the action be subject to the declaration.
Section 8 requires the department of regulatory agencies to include
in its SMART Act report information concerning construction liability insurance and the basis for rates.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | J. Bacon (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) R. Rodriguez (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/20/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1269
|
Title: |
Building Decarbonization Measures |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Committee on Energy & Environment Refer Amended to Finance (03/06/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning building decarbonization measures, and, in connection therewith, creating a building decarbonization enterprise. | Background | | Summary | The bill updates energy use benchmarking and performance
standard requirements for owners of certain buildings (covered building owners), including:
A requirement to meet 2040 performance standards, as adopted by the air quality control commission, in
consultation with the Colorado energy office (office) and in consideration of recommendations made by a task force convened by the office;
Authorizing an alternative compliance mechanism for covered building owners to comply with certain performance standards; and
Aligning civil penalties owed for a violation of the benchmarking and performance standard requirements with civil penalties owed for other air quality violations.
The bill also creates a building decarbonization enterprise
(enterprise) to provide financial assistance, technical assistance, and other programmatic assistance to covered building owners to effectively and efficiently implement building decarbonization measures, including energy efficiency measures, electrification measures, energy upgrades, and participation in utility on-bill repayment programs. The enterprise is authorized to impose and collect from covered building owners an annual building decarbonization fee to cover the enterprise's costs in providing the financial, technical, and programmatic assistance.
The bill exempts a local government that adopts building codes
from the requirement to adopt an energy code if the local government has adopted an approved wildfire resiliency code.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | A. Valdez (D) J. Willford (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Sponsors | C. Kipp (D) M. Ball (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/13/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1272
|
Title: |
Construction Defects & Middle Market Housing |
Position | Monitor | Status | House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments (03/21/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning housing. | Background | | Summary | For construction of middle market housing, section 3 of the bill
requires a person filing a construction defect action against an architect or engineer to file with the complaint an affidavit of a third-party licensed professional indicating the negligence or other action, error, or omission of the construction professional. Section 3 also establishes a rebuttable presumption that a property does not have a construction defect when a state agency or local government has issued a certificate of occupancy for the property.
Section 4:
Establishes a claimant's duty to mitigate an alleged construction defect and specifies how a claimant may satisfy this duty and the consequences to a claimant that fails to satisfy this duty;
Requires that a construction professional must send or deliver to the claimant an offer to settle the claim or a written response that identifies the standards that apply to the claim and explains why the defect does not require repair; and
Requires a construction professional who is the defendant in a construction defects action to submit specified information to the claimant.
Section 5 updates the statute of limitations for construction defect
claims to 10 years unless the construction professional provided the consumer with a warranty that meets the requirements of the bill, in which case the statute of limitations is 6 years. Section 6 tolls the statute of limitations or repose during a claimant's mitigation of an alleged construction defect claim brought for the construction of middle market housing.
Section 7 allows a construction professional that meets specified
requirements to use certain affirmative defenses in construction claims brought against the construction professional for the construction of middle market housing.
Current law requires the executive board of a unit owners'
association (executive board) to obtain approval from a majority of owners before initiating a construction defect claim on behalf of the owners. Section 8 increases the approval amount to 65%. Section 8 also requires an executive board that is successful in a construction defect claim to first use monetary damages received as a result of the claim to repair the construction defect.
| Hearing Date | 03/25/2025 | House Sponsors | S. Bird (D) A. Boesenecker (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Sponsors | J. Coleman (D) D. Roberts (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/05/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1286
|
Title: |
Protecting Workers from Extreme Temperatures |
Position | Oppose | Status | Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor (02/24/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning protecting workers from exposure to extreme temperatures. | Background | | Summary | The bill requires employers to implement protections for workers
who are exposed to extreme hot and cold temperatures at the worksite, including temperature mitigation measures, rest breaks, and temperature-related injury and illness prevention plans.
| Hearing Date | 03/27/2025 | House Sponsors | M. Froelich (D) E. Velasco (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | M. Weissman (D) L. Cutter (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/11/2025) |
|
Bill:
HB25-1300
|
Title: |
Workers' Compensation Benefits Proof of Entitlement |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor (03/12/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning claimants' access to medical care in workers' compensation claims, and, in connection therewith, shifting the burden of proof for a claimant's entitlement to medical benefits that are recommended by an authorized treating physician, requiring an employer or the employer's insurer to use the division of workers' compensation's utilization standards, and changing the mechanism by which a claimant can choose a treating physician. | Background | | Summary | In a dispute in a workers' compensation claim, current law requires
a claimant to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the claimant's entitlement to medical benefits. When the dispute concerns whether the medical treatment recommended by an authorized treating physician is reasonable, necessary, and related to the claimant's injury, the bill shifts the burden of proof from the claimant to the claimant's employer or the employer's workers' compensation insurer.
The bill provides injured workers control over the selection of
their primary treating physician in workers' compensation cases, allowing them to choose from any level I or level II accredited physician through the division of workers' compensation. The bill creates the mechanism by which an injured worker may select the treating physician and requires the employer or insurer to choose the physician when an injured worker is unable or unwilling to select the treating physician.
| Hearing Date | 03/26/2025 | House Sponsors | J. Willford (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | C. Kipp (D) | Senate Committee | | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/13/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-002
|
Title: |
Regional Building Codes for Factory-Built Structures |
Position | Monitor | Status | Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Refer Amended to Appropriations (02/06/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the development of regional building codes that account for local climatic and geographic conditions for the construction and installation of residential and nonresidential factory-built structures. | Background | | Summary | The bill provides that after the state housing board (board) adopts
rules about any activity required to undertake or complete the construction or installation of a factory-built nonresidential structure, a
factory-built residential structure, or a factory-built tiny home (factory-built structure), the state plumbing board, the state electrical board, and the state fire suppression administrator do not have jurisdiction over and their rules do not apply to a factory-built structure.
On or before July 1, 2026, the advisory committee on factory-built
structures (advisory committee) is required to develop regional building codes for factory-built structures and implementation requirements and submit the recommended codes to the board.
On or before July 1, 2026, the board must adopt rules:
Implementing regional building code recommendations from the advisory committee that account for local climatic and geographic conditions for the construction and installation of factory-built structures, which supersede any conflicting ordinance, code, regulation, or other law of a local government unless the local government adopts the rules of the board;
Covering the implementation requirements developed by the advisory committee, including authorizing a local government certified by the division of housing (division) to perform inspections of factory-built structures on behalf of the division and registration, responsibility, and accountability requirements for a manufacturer, installer, seller, or general contractor who develops the installation site or completes the construction of a factory-built structure at the installation site;
Covering electrical, plumbing, or fire suppression activity required to undertake or complete the construction or installation of a factory-built structure;
Allowing the division to contract for third-party review and approval of a final design plan for a factory-built structure on behalf of the division;
Allowing the division to create a process for vetting and approving the ability of a third party to review and approve a final design plan for a factory-built structure on behalf of the division; and
Requiring the division to cause an audit to be performed on a third party that reviews and approves design plans.
On or before July 1, 2026, the advisory committee is required to conduct a study on behalf of the division about whether the international building code or residential code standards that apply to site requirements should be incorporated into state statutes and rules and to determine whether the state should regulate non-factory-built components that are connected to a factory-built structure at the installation site and are currently under local jurisdiction. The division is required to deliver the study to the board when complete.
A county or municipality may not:
Enact a regulation that excludes factory-built structures and manufactured homes from the county or municipality;
Impose more restrictive standards on factory-built structures and manufactured homes than those that the county or municipality applies to site-built homes in the same residential zones in the county or municipality; or
Enact or enforce a regulation, law, or ordinance affecting the installation or construction of a factory-built structure or manufactured home.
A county or municipality may:
Enact land use regulations to the extent that the regulations are applicable to existing housing or structures or new site-built housing in the county or municipality; and
Enact a building code provision for unique public safety requirements unless the provision applies to a factory-built structure or manufactured home.
A county or municipality must comply with the requirements established by the division for factory-built structures and by the United States department of housing and urban development for manufactured homes.
The bill requires the state treasurer to transfer $600,000 on July 1,
2025, from the innovative housing incentive program fund to the building regulation fund.
| Hearing Date | 03/26/2025 | House Sponsors | A. Boesenecker (D) R. Stewart (D) | House Committee | | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) T. Exum Sr. (D) | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/23/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-005
|
Title: |
Worker Protection Collective Bargaining |
Position | Oppose | Status | House Committee on Business Affairs & Labor Refer Unamended to Appropriations (03/13/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the elimination of the requirement for a second election to negotiate a union security clause in the collective bargaining process, and, in connection therewith, reducing an appropriation. | Background | | Summary | The bill eliminates the requirement for a second election to
negotiate a union security agreement clause in the collective bargaining process.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | J. Bacon (D) J. Mabrey (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | J. Danielson (D) R. Rodriguez (D) | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/16/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-018
|
Title: |
Online Search of Sales & Use Tax |
Position | Support | Status | Senate Committee on Finance Refer Unamended to Appropriations (01/28/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning online searching for sales and use tax information. | Background | | Summary | Sales and Use Tax Simplification Task Force. Currently, the
department of revenue (department) does not have authority to allow a sales and use tax license and a sales and use tax exemption certificate to be searchable by the name and identification number of the sales and use tax licensee or the sales and use tax exemption certificate holder. The bill directs the department's executive director to allow this type of search.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | R. Taggart (R) | House Committee | | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) C. Kipp (D) | Senate Committee | Finance | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/10/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-039
|
Title: |
Agricultural Buildings Exempt from Energy Use Requirements |
Position | Support | Status | Sent to the Governor (03/19/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning exemptions from energy use reporting requirements for owners of agricultural buildings. | Background | | Summary | Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee. Under
current law, owners of certain large buildings (covered buildings) are required to annually collect and report each covered building's energy use to the Colorado energy office.
The bill clarifies that agricultural buildings are not covered
buildings, and, therefore, owners of agricultural buildings are exempt
from the energy use collecting and reporting requirements. The bill defines an agricultural building as a building or structure used to house agricultural implements, hay, unprocessed grain, poultry, livestock, or other agricultural products or inputs.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | M. Martinez (D) D. Johnson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) B. Pelton (R) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/15/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-040
|
Title: |
Future of Severance Taxes & Water Funding Task Force |
Position | Monitor | Status | Senate Committee on Agriculture & Natural Resources Refer Amended to Appropriations (01/29/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the creation of the future of severance taxes and water funding task force. | Background | | Summary | Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee. The bill
creates the future of severance taxes and water funding task force (task force).
The department of natural resources is required to contract with a
third party to conduct a study on severance taxes and water funding and develop recommendations for ways to continue funding water needs in
the face of decreasing severance tax revenue (study). The purpose of the task force is to work with the third party to conduct the study and develop recommendations.
No later than January 15, 2026, the third party must submit a draft
report, detailing the results of the study and any recommendations, to the department of natural resources and the task force for review. The task force is required to provide input on the draft report. No later than July 15, 2026, the third party must submit a final report, which incorporates the input of the task force, to the water resources and agriculture review committee (committee). The task force must present the final report to the committee during the 2026 legislative interim.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | M. Martinez (D) K. McCormick (D) | House Committee | | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/06/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-046
|
Title: |
Local Government Tax Audit Confidentiality Standards |
Position | Support | Status | Governor Signed (03/20/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning local government sales or use tax investigations, and, in connection therewith, establishing uniform confidentiality standards for the protection of taxpayer information. | Background | | Summary | Sales and Use Tax Simplification Task Force. Section 1 of the
bill establishes uniform confidentiality standards for the protection of taxpayer information used or obtained in connection with a sales or use
tax investigation performed by a third-party auditor on behalf of a local taxing jurisdiction. Third-party auditors are generally prohibited from divulging or making known in any way to any person information that is obtained from a sales or use tax investigation on behalf of a local taxing jurisdiction or disclosed in any document, report, or return filed in connection with local sales or use taxes. Third-party auditors are permitted to disclose taxpayer information in certain limited circumstances, including disclosure to:
An official, employee, hearing officer, attorney, or other public agent of the local taxing jurisdiction who is authorized to receive such information in connection with the local taxing jurisdiction's sales or use tax investigation performed by the third-party auditor;
A requesting taxpayer, or the taxpayer's authorized agent, of the taxpayer's own tax filings;
The department of revenue (department) for purposes of statistical analysis and publication as authorized by current law; and
The department and the federal internal revenue service as necessary and pertinent to a taxpayer's compliance or failure to comply with state or federal tax law.
Violation of the confidentiality provisions in section 1 is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 per violation.
Section 2 clarifies the authority of the executive director of the
department to share taxpayer information with statutory local governments, special districts, and requesting home rule jurisdictions as necessary to facilitate dispute resolution, coordination, intergovernmental agreements, and information sharing between the department and such local governments consistent with current law, which prohibits the disclosure of any such shared information to any third party.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | R. Taggart (R) | House Committee | Finance | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) C. Kipp (D) | Senate Committee | Finance | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (01/15/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-115
|
Title: |
Seedling Tree Nursery Spending Authority Extension |
Position | Monitor | Status | Governor Signed (02/27/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning an extension of spending authority for the Colorado state forest service seedling tree nursery. | Background | | Summary | Joint Budget Committee. For money appropriated to the
Colorado state university system for use by the Colorado state forest service to renovate and expand the seedling tree nursery, the bill extends the spending authority through the 2026-27 state fiscal year.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | E. Sirota (D) R. Taggart (R) | House Committee | Appropriations | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) B. Kirkmeyer (R) | Senate Committee | Appropriations | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/03/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-128
|
Title: |
Agricultural Worker Service Providers Access Private Property |
Position | Support | Status | House Second Reading Laid Over Daily - No Amendments (03/19/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning repealing certain provisions that prohibit an employer from interfering with an agricultural employee's access to service providers, and, in connection therewith, repealing provisions that prohibit an employer from interfering with an agricultural employee's access to service providers on private land. | Background | | Summary | The bill repeals current state law provisions that, in part, govern
agricultural workers' key service providers' access to private property.
| Hearing Date | 03/25/2025 | House Sponsors | K. McCormick (D) T. Winter (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) B. Pelton (R) | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/10/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-144
|
Title: |
Change Paid Family Medical Leave Insurance Prog |
Position | Monitor | Status | Introduced In House - Assigned to Business Affairs & Labor (03/19/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning changes to the "Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance Act". | Background | | Summary | With regard to the family and medical leave insurance program
(program), section 1 of the bill extends the duration of paid family and medical leave, up to an additional 12 weeks, for a parent who has a child receiving inpatient care in a neonatal intensive care unit.
Section 2 changes the premiums financing the payment of program
benefits by extending the current premium amount, 0.9% of wages per
employee, through 2025 and setting the premium amount for the 2026 calendar year at 0.88% of wages per employee. For each subsequent calendar year, the director of the division of family and medical leave insurance (director) in the department of labor and employment is required set the premium on or before November 1 of the preceding year. The director is required to set the premium in a manner such that:
At the end of the year, the balance of the family and medical leave insurance fund (fund) is not less than 6 months' worth of projected expenditures from the fund required for performance of the functions and duties of the director;
The volatility of the premium rate is minimized; and
The premium amount does not exceed 1.2% of wages per employee.
| Hearing Date | 04/02/2025 | House Sponsors | J. Willford (D) Y. Zokaie (D) | House Committee | Business Affairs and Labor | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) J. Bridges (D) | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/21/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-157
|
Title: |
Deceptive Trade Practice Significant Impact Standard |
Position | Monitor | Status | Senate Second Reading Laid Over to 03/28/2025 - No Amendments (03/25/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning reducing burdens to enforcement of laws prohibiting deceptive acts. | Background | | Summary | The bill establishes that certain evidence that a person has engaged
in an unfair or deceptive trade practice constitutes a significant impact to the public. The bill also clarifies that a deceptive trade practice claim cannot be based solely on a claim that a person breached a contract or engaged in negligence or on a claim for damages based on the rendering of professional services, unless the claim for damages involves an
allegation of a material misrepresentation of fact, a failure to disclose material information, or an action that cannot be characterized as providing advice, judgment, or opinion.
| Hearing Date | 03/25/2025 | House Sponsors | B. Titone (D) J. Mabrey (D) | House Committee | | Senate Sponsors | M. Weissman (D) J. Gonzales (D) | Senate Committee | Business, Labor and Technology | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/12/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-163
|
Title: |
Battery Stewardship Programs |
Position | Monitor | Status | Senate Committee on Health & Human Services Refer Amended to Appropriations (02/26/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the establishment of battery stewardship programs for the disposal of certain batteries. | Background | | Summary | The bill requires an organization, defined in the bill as a battery
stewardship organization, to, no later than July 1, 2026, and every 5 years thereafter, submit to the executive director of the department of public health and environment (executive director) a battery stewardship plan (plan), which is a plan for the collection, transportation, processing, and recycling of certain batteries.
On and after August 1, 2026, a producer selling, making available
for sale, or distributing certain batteries or battery-containing products in or into the state must participate in and finance a battery stewardship organization that has submitted a plan to the executive director. On and after July 1, 2028, a retailer is prohibited from selling, offering for sale, distributing, or otherwise making available for sale certain batteries or battery-containing products in the state, unless the producer of the batteries or battery-containing products is participating in a battery stewardship organization that has an approved plan. A retailer is prohibited from charging a point-of-sale fee to consumers to cover the costs of a battery stewardship organization.
The bill specifies what a plan must contain to be approved by the
executive director, including, among other things, contact information for participating producers, performance goals, and methods to promote participation in the plan and increase public awareness of the battery stewardship program (program) that will be implemented by the battery stewardship organization pursuant to the plan. In addition, a plan must detail how the battery stewardship organization will arrange for the collection of certain batteries by establishing collection sites that are freely available to any person.
A battery stewardship organization implementing an approved plan
is required to develop and administer a system to collect charges from participating producers to cover the costs of implementing the program. In addition, a battery stewardship organization, in consultation with the department of public health and environment (department) and interested stakeholders, must complete an assessment of the opportunities and challenges associated with the end-of-life management of certain batteries, which assessment must be submitted to the general assembly on or before October 1, 2027.
On or before June 1, 2028, and on or before each June 1 thereafter,
a battery stewardship organization with an approved plan must submit an annual report to the executive director, which report must include certain information about the preceding year of plan implementation. The bill also requires a battery stewardship organization to carry out promotional activities to increase public awareness of the program. Battery stewardship organizations with approved plans must coordinate to conduct a survey of public awareness of the programs and share the results of the survey with the executive director as part of the annual reports.
On or before December 1, 2026, and on or before each December
1 thereafter, the department must provide each battery stewardship organization with an accounting of the organization's portion of the costs in administering a program, and the battery stewardship organization is required to pay to the department an annual fee based on the department's accounting by July 1 of each year. Fees will be credited to the battery
stewardship fund created in the state treasury.
The bill requires a producer or retailer to mark certain batteries
with labels that:
Identify the producer of the batteries; and
Include certain information to ensure the proper collection and recycling of the batteries.
Beginning January 1, 2029, a person is required to manage certain
unwanted batteries through delivery to a collection site, event, or program established by a battery stewardship program. A person is prohibited from disposing of certain batteries in a landfill.
A producer or battery stewardship organization that violates any
of the bill's requirements is liable for a civil penalty of $7,000 per violation; except that a battery stewardship organization that fails to pay a fee required by the department pursuant to the bill's requirements is liable for a civil penalty that is double the applicable fee.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | K. Brown (D) R. Stewart (D) | House Committee | | Senate Sponsors | L. Cutter (D) | Senate Committee | Health and Human Services | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (02/24/2025) |
|
Bill:
SB25-185
|
Title: |
Claims Against Construction Professionals |
Position | Oppose | Status | Introduced In House - Assigned to Judiciary (03/25/2025) | Category | | | | Description | Concerning the inapplicability of the economic loss rule to certain claims brought by a residential property owner against a construction professional. | Background | | Summary | The bill clarifies that construction professionals owe an
independent tort duty of care to construct residential homes in a non-defective and reasonable manner, and that this duty is owed equally to original and subsequent residential home purchasers.
| Hearing Date | | House Sponsors | M. Soper (R) J. Bacon (D) | House Committee | Judiciary | Senate Sponsors | R. Rodriguez (D) B. Pelton (R) | Senate Committee | Judiciary | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (03/10/2025) |
|
|