Bill Tracker
based on: Profile: 2023 CLA Bill Tracker
 Loading... Please Wait
You have 29 bills in your selected Profile
download to spreadsheet
download to pdf
download to docx
Notes about this profile:
Bill:
HB23-1011
|
Title: |
Consumer Right To Repair Agricultural Equipment |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/09/2023 | Description | Concerning a requirement that an agricultural equipment manufacturer facilitate the repair of its equipment by providing certain other persons with the resources needed to repair the manufacturer's agricultural equipment. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture- Business & Economic Development | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: N. Hinrichsen (D) J. Marchman (D) House: B. Titone (D) R. Weinberg (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (05/18/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Usually, an owner of agricultural equipment must seek diagnostic,
maintenance, or repair services of the equipment from the agricultural
equipment manufacturer (manufacturer).
Starting January 1, 2024, the bill requires a manufacturer to
provide parts, embedded software, firmware, tools, or documentation, such as diagnostic, maintenance, or repair manuals, diagrams, or similar information (resources), to independent repair providers and owners of the manufacturer's agricultural equipment to allow an independent repair provider or owner to conduct diagnostic, maintenance, or repair services on the owner's agricultural equipment.
The bill folds agricultural equipment into the existing consumer
right-to-repair statutes, which statutes provide the following:
A manufacturer's failure to comply with the requirement to provide resources is a deceptive trade practice;
In complying with the requirement to provide resources, a manufacturer need not divulge any trade secrets to independent repair providers and owners; and
Any new contractual provision or other arrangement that a manufacturer enters into that would remove or limit the manufacturer's obligation to provide resources to independent repair providers and owners is void and unenforceable.
| House Sponsors | B. Titone (D) R. Weinberg (R) | Senate Sponsors | N. Hinrichsen (D) J. Marchman (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (04/25/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1066
|
Title: |
Public Access Landlocked Publicly Owned Land |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/19/2023 | Description | Concerning authorizing an individual to move between two adjacent parcels of public land that touch at the corners, and, in connection therewith, creating a task force to study the issue of access to public lands that are blocked by privately owned lands and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Courts & Judicial- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) House: E. Velasco (D) B. Bradley (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (09/07/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 1 of the bill authorizes an individual to move from one
corner of public land to another corner of public land where 2 public parcels meet 2 private parcels and share a common border, without being liable for criminal or civil trespass, if:
2 parcels of public land touch so that the individual can
reasonably step from one parcel of public land to the other parcel of public land, or if there's a fence, could make the step as if there were not a fence;
The individual moves over private land only as much as necessary to cross from one parcel of public land to the other;
The individual does not step on or stand on the privately owned land or touch a fence on or other improvement to the privately owned land, but the individual may use mechanical means to move over the privately owned land; and
The individual does not use a vehicle other than a wheelchair to cross over the private land.
This authorization does not apply to the following:
Moving over an improvement to public land that is designed to be occupied by individuals;
Entering public land to use it in a way that violates the law;
Moving over public land that the governing entity has prohibited the general public from entering or has controlled access to.
Section 1 also prohibits a landowner from erecting an
improvement to such a corner that is more than 54 inches high within 4 feet of the corner.
Section 2 requires a court to dismiss a trespass tort if the defendant
has complied with section 1. A successful defendant is awarded costs, including attorney fees.
Section 3 instructs the parks and wildlife commission to
promulgate rules codifying the actions allowed in section 1. The division of parks and wildlife will publicize the rules.
| House Sponsors | E. Velasco (D) B. Bradley (R) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Appropriations | Status | Senate Committee on Appropriations Postpone Indefinitely (05/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1152
|
Title: |
Prohibit Foreign Ownership Agricultural and Natural Resources |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/31/2023 | Description | Concerning prohibiting the ownership of certain property interests by covered foreign persons that are not located in the United States. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate:
House: B. Bradley (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/08/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill prohibits, on or after January 1, 2024, a nonresident
foreign citizen, foreign entity, or foreign government of the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation, or any country determined by the United States secretary of state to be a state sponsor of terrorism (covered foreign person) from acquiring a controlling ownership share in
agricultural land, mineral rights, or water rights (property interest) in the state (prohibition). A covered foreign person who acquires a controlling ownership share in a property interest in the state prior to January 1, 2024, may continue to own the property interest but may not acquire a controlling ownership share in any additional property interests in the state.
No later than March 1, 2024, or 60 days after acquiring any
ownership in a property interest in the state, whichever is later, a covered foreign person must register with the secretary of state (registration requirement). The secretary of state is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the registration requirement.
If the attorney general has reason to believe that a covered foreign
person has violated the prohibition or has not complied with the registration requirement, the attorney general must commence a civil action against the covered foreign person in a district court. If a district court finds that the covered foreign person has violated the prohibition, the district court must issue a judgment reverting the property interest to the state. If the district court finds that the covered person has not complied with the registration requirement, the district court must impose a penalty of no more than $2,000 for each violation.
| House Sponsors | B. Bradley (R) | Senate Sponsors | | House Committee | State, Civic, Military and Veterans Affairs | Senate Committee | | Status | House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely (02/23/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1154
|
Title: |
Ballot Issue Greenhouse Gas Emissions Report |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/31/2023 | Description | Concerning requirements for initiatives with a projected environmental impact that are properly submitted to the title board, and, in connection therewith, requiring the director of research of the legislative council to prepare a preliminary report for such initiatives, requiring the title of such initiatives to reflect the findings of the preliminary report, and requiring that the findings are referenced in the ballot information booklet entry for such initiatives. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Elections & Redistricting | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate:
House: A. Valdez (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/24/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Current law allows a legislative measure to include a greenhouse
gas emissions report (report) prepared by the nonpartisan staff of the legislative council that indicates whether the legislative measure is likely to cause a net increase, decrease, or indeterminate amount of greenhouse gas pollution in the 10-year period following its enactment. A report must consider new sources of emissions, increases or decreases in existing sources of emissions, and any impact on sequestration of emissions. The department of natural resources, the Colorado energy office, and other state agencies with relevant subject matter expertise are required to cooperate with and provide information, if requested, to the legislative council staff to assist in the preparation of a report.
The bill requires the director of research of the legislative council
(director) to prepare a preliminary report that requires an analysis on whether a properly submitted initiative has a net change in greenhouse gas emissions that directly impacts the following sectors:
Electric power;
Natural gas and oil systems;
Transportation;
Residential, commercial, or industrial fuel use;
Industrial processes;
Coal mining and abandoned mines;
Waste management;
Land use, land use change, or forestry; and
Agriculture.
The director is required to provide proponents of the proposed
initiative, or their representatives, and the secretary of state with the preliminary report no later than the time of the title board meeting at which the proposed initiated measure is to be considered.
The bill requires the ballot title of a measure that has a net increase
in greenhouse gas emissions as indicated by the preliminary report to begin with Shall there be an increase in greenhouse gas emissions.... The ballot title of a measure that has a net decrease in greenhouse gas emissions as indicated by the preliminary report must begin with Shall there be a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions....
If it is determined in the preliminary report that the proposed
initiative is likely to directly cause a net increase or decrease, excluding any de minimis net changes, in greenhouse gas pollution in the 10-year period following the potential enactment of the initiative, staff of the legislative council are required to prepare a full report. The department of natural resources, the Colorado energy office, and other state agencies with relevant subject matter expertise are required to assist the staff of the legislative council with information in preparation of the report if
requested.
Proponents may file a motion for a rehearing with the secretary of
state within 7 days after the title board sets the initiative's title on the grounds that the preliminary report is misleading or prejudicial. The title board may modify the preliminary report based on information presented at the rehearing. If the title board modifies the report, the secretary of state shall provide the director with a copy of the amended report and the director shall post the new version of the report on the legislative council's website.
The bill further requires the ballot information booklet to include
any required preliminary report for any statewide measure and provide information on how to obtain the full greenhouse gas emissions report if one is available.
| House Sponsors | A. Valdez (D) | Senate Sponsors | | House Committee | State, Civic, Military and Veterans Affairs | Senate Committee | | Status | House Committee on State, Civic, Military, & Veterans Affairs Postpone Indefinitely (03/09/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1161
|
Title: |
Environmental Standards For Appliances |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/01/2023 | Description | Concerning environmental standards for certain products, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Business & Economic Development- Energy- Public Health | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) L. Cutter (D) House: C. Kipp (D) J. Willford (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/28/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Amend | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Current law establishes water and energy efficiency standards
(standards) for certain appliances and fixtures sold in Colorado. Sections 1 through 7 of the bill expand the appliances and fixtures that are subject to the standards and update the standards.
Specifically, section 4 updates standards for certain appliances and
fixtures that are sold in Colorado on and after certain dates, including:
Certain faucets and urinals;
Certain lamps;
Commercial hot food holding cabinets;
Portable electric spas;
Residential ventilating fans; and
Spray sprinkler bodies.
Section 4 also creates new standards for certain appliances and
other fixtures that are sold in Colorado on and after January 1, 2024, including:
Air purifiers;
Commercial ovens;
Electric storage water heaters;
Electric vehicle supply equipment;
Gas fireplaces;
Irrigation controllers;
Tub spout diverters and showerhead tub spout diverter combinations; and
Certain residential windows, residential doors, and residential skylights.
Section 4 also removes standards for air compressors, general
service lamps, and uninterruptible power supplies.
Section 5 requires the executive director of the department of
public health and environment (executive director) to promulgate rules on or before January 1, 2026, and every 5 years thereafter:
Adopting a more recent version of any standard; and
Establishing standards for appliances and other devices that are not subject to the standards if certain conditions are met.
Section 6 exempts manufacturers of products subject to the
standards from having to demonstrate that a product complies with the law if the product appears in the state appliance standards database maintained by the Northeast Energy Efficiency Partnerships, or a successor organization. Section 6 also requires the executive director to conduct periodic, unannounced inspections of major distributors or retailers, including online retailers, of new products in order to determine compliance with the standards.
Under current law, any person who sells or offers to sell in the
state any new consumer product that is required to meet an efficiency standard but that the person knows does not meet that standard is subject to a civil penalty of not more than $2,000 for each violation, which amount is credited to the general fund. Section 7 credits any penalties imposed to the energy fund created in the Colorado energy office rather than to the general fund and specifies that each transaction or online for-sale product listing constitutes a separate violation.
Section 8 establishes the Clean Lighting Act to phase out the
sale of general-purpose fluorescent light bulbs that contain mercury. With certain exceptions:
On and after January 1, 2024, a person shall not manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in Colorado any new compact fluorescent lamp with a screw- or bayonet-type base; and
On and after January 1, 2025, a person shall not manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in Colorado any linear fluorescent lamp or any compact fluorescent lamp with a pin-type base.
Section 9 establishes standards for heating and water heating
appliances. With certain exceptions, on and after January 1, 2025, a person shall not manufacture, distribute, sell, offer for sale, lease, or offer for lease in Colorado any new water heater, boiler, or fan-type central furnace unless the emissions of the product do not exceed certain limits on emissions. On or before January 1, 2029, the air quality control commission in the department of public health and environment must promulgate rules lowering the emission limits. Section 9 also requires manufacturers to use certain testing protocols, display certain information on each product, and demonstrate compliance through one of various described means.
Sections 8 and 9 both require the executive director to conduct
periodic, unannounced inspections of major distributors or retailers, including online retailers, of new products to determine compliance and to report violations to the attorney general. If the attorney general has probable cause to believe that a violation occurred, the attorney general may bring a civil action on behalf of the state to seek the imposition of civil penalties, and any civil penalties are to be deposited in the energy fund.
| House Sponsors | C. Kipp (D) J. Willford (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) L. Cutter (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | Transportation and Energy | Status | Governor Signed (06/01/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1165
|
Title: |
County Authority To Prohibit Firearms Discharge |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/02/2023 | Description | Concerning the authority of a board of county commissioners to prohibit discharge of firearms in unincorporated areas of a county. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Local Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: J. Amabile (D) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/08/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Under existing law, a board of county commissioners (board) may
designate unincorporated areas of a county where it is unlawful to discharge firearms, except the board may not prohibit discharge of firearms in shooting galleries, on private grounds, or in residences under circumstances that do not endanger persons or property. A designated
area must have an average population density of 100 persons or more per square mile.
The bill repeals the exception for private property, repeals the
minimum population density requirement, and instead requires that the designated area have 30 dwellings or more per square mile. A board is not allowed to prohibit discharge of a firearm in a designated area by a peace officer, in an indoor shooting gallery located in a private residence, or at a shooting range.
| House Sponsors | J. Amabile (D) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Senate Committee on Local Government & Housing Postpone Indefinitely (05/04/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1220
|
Title: |
Study Republican River Groundwater Economic Impact |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/27/2023 | Description | Concerning a study regarding the economic impact of the elimination of large-capacity groundwater withdrawal within the Republican river basin, and, in connection therewith, requiring the Colorado water center to conduct the study and report its findings and conclusions to certain legislative committees and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Pelton (R) B. Pelton (R) House: R. Holtorf (R) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/28/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | In 1942, Colorado entered into an interstate compact (compact)
with Nebraska and Kansas regarding the allocation of water from the Republican river basin (basin). Colorado ratified the compact in 1943. In 2016, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas signed a resolution (resolution) regarding a dispute about Colorado's compliance with the compact, through which resolution and its amendment Colorado agreed to retire 25,000 acres of irrigated acreage in the basin by 2029.
The bill requires the Colorado water center (center) in the
Colorado state university to study the anticipated economic effects of the forced elimination of groundwater withdrawals within and surrounding the Colorado portion of the Republican river basin that could occur if Colorado fails to comply with the resolution. The center is required to prepare a progress report and, on or before January 1, 2026, a final report of the center's findings and conclusions from the study and to post both reports on the center's website. The center must present the progress and final reports to certain legislative committees.
| House Sponsors | R. Holtorf (R) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Pelton (R) B. Pelton (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Appropriations | Status | Governor Signed (06/03/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1221
|
Title: |
Water Quality Data Standards |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/27/2023 | Description | Concerning data standards for the determination of a total maximum daily load for state waters. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: C. Simpson (R) House: M. Soper (R) T. Mauro (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/26/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill requires the division of administration in the department
of public health and environment, on and after January 1, 2024, to use quality-assured data to determine the maximum amount of a pollutant that can be discharged daily into state waters without exceeding applicable water quality standards.
| House Sponsors | M. Soper (R) T. Mauro (D) | Senate Sponsors | C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | | Status | House Committee on Appropriations Lay Over Unamended - Amendment(s) Failed (05/11/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1242
|
Title: |
Water Conservation In Oil And Gas Operations |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/11/2023 | Description | Concerning water used in oil and gas operations, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Energy- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) L. Cutter (D) House: A. Boesenecker (D) J. Joseph (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/07/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill requires an oil and gas operator in the state (operator), on
or before January 31, 2024, and at least annually thereafter, to report information to the Colorado oil and gas conservation commission (commission) regarding the operator's use of water entering, utilized at, or exiting each of the operator's oil and gas locations.
The bill also requires the commission to adopt rules requiring that:
When issuing an operator a new or renewed oil and gas permit on or after June 1, 2024, the commission include as
a condition of the permit a requirement that the operator use a decreasing percentage of fresh water and a corresponding increasing percentage of recycled or reused water in the operator's oil and gas operations; and
Each oil and gas operator, on and after January 1, 2024, report on a monthly basis to the commission about the daily vehicle miles traveled for any trucks hauling water to, within, or from the operator's oil and gas operations in the state.
From the information reported to the commission under the bill,
the commission is required to:
Include the information as part of the commission's annual reporting on cumulative impacts of oil and gas operations;
Report to the division of administration (division) in the department of public health and environment, on a per-incident basis, any indication of technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material or PFAS chemicals present in produced water; and
On a quarterly basis, submit a cumulative report to the division and the department of transportation on reported vehicle miles traveled and public roads traveled.
| House Sponsors | A. Boesenecker (D) J. Joseph (D) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) L. Cutter (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | Transportation and Energy | Status | Governor Signed (06/07/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1264
|
Title: |
Update Livestock Health Act |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/27/2023 | Description | Concerning the authority of the commissioner of agriculture to act in instances involving the health of livestock. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: R. Pelton (R) J. Marchman (D) House: M. Catlin (R) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/29/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Current law authorizes the inspection, testing, quarantine,
condemnation, and destruction of livestock when there is an outbreak of an infectious or contagious disease. The bill:
Removes the requirement that the inspection, testing, and quarantine of livestock occur pursuant to rules promulgated
by the commissioner of agriculture (commissioner);
Moves the authority to condemn and destroy livestock from the state agricultural commission to the commissioner and only when the commissioner, state veterinarian, and governor agree that the condemnation and destruction is justified and necessary for the safety and protection of the livestock of the state; and
Changes the appraisal process that is required before livestock may be condemned and destroyed.
The bill gives the commissioner the authority to investigate all
buildings, yards, pens, pastures, and other areas in which any animals are kept, handled, or transported to ensure compliance with the Livestock Health Act. The commissioner may:
Administer oaths and take statements;
Issue administrative subpoenas requiring the attendance of witnesses and the production of all books, memoranda, papers, and other documents, articles, or instruments; and
Compel the disclosure by witnesses of all facts known to them that are relevant to the matters under investigation.
Under current law, it is an unlawful act to alter or falsify a health
certificate issued for the import of livestock into the state. The bill makes it an unlawful act to alter or falsify a health certificate issued for the export of livestock out of the state.
| House Sponsors | M. Catlin (R) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | R. Pelton (R) J. Marchman (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/18/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
HB23-1294
|
Title: |
Pollution Protection Measures |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/13/2023 | Description | Concerning measures to protect communities from pollution, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) J. Gonzales (D) House: J. Bacon (D) J. Willford (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/29/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 2 of the bill removes the requirement that the air quality
control commission (AQCC) promulgate rules setting the conditions and limitations for periods of start-up, shutdown, or malfunction of a source of air pollution (source) that justify temporary relief from an emission control regulation.
Current law provides that a person shall not permit the emission
of air pollutants at a nonresidential structure unless an air pollution emission notice has been filed with the division of administration in the department of public health and environment (division). Section 5 adds the requirements that any:
Relevant permits have been approved by the division; and
Applicable period of review by the federal environmental protection agency has been completed.
Section 6 removes the prohibition against the AQCC adopting
rules covering indirect sources that are more stringent than applicable federal law.
Section 6 also requires the division, in evaluating a construction
permit application for a source that includes new oil and gas operations, to:
Aggregate emissions from a proposed or modified oil and gas system; and
Consider emissions from exploration and preproduction activities if a proposed or modified oil and gas system is in an ozone nonattainment area and if the activities will be conducted beginning May 1 and ending August 31 of any year (ozone season).
Section 8 clarifies that only the filing of a renewable operating
permit application can operate as a defense to an enforcement action for operating without a permit during the time period that the division or the AQCC is reviewing the permit application.
Current law requires the division or the AQCC to give public
notice of certain construction permit applications or renewable operating permit applications and of certain public hearings through a newspaper publication or another method that ensures effective public notice. Current law also requires the division to maintain a copy of a construction permit application and applicable preliminary analysis or a notice of public hearing with the county clerk and recorder of the county where the applicable project is located. Section 8 also removes the newspaper publication option and the county clerk and recorder filing requirements and provides for alternative methods of giving public notice, including posting information about the application or any public hearings on the division's or the AQCC's website.
Current law requires the division or AQCC to make a finding that
a source or activity will meet all applicable emission control regulations, including ambient air quality standards (AAQS), before granting a permit for the source or activity. Section 8 also requires that, beginning January 1, 2024, for at least any source or activity that has the potential to emit levels of air contaminants above certain modeling thresholds, the division or AQCC must base any finding that the source or activity will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable AAQS on air quality modeling.
Section 8 also allows the division, after an investigation into
whether an activity meets the requirements of a construction permit, to propose additional terms and conditions of the construction permit.
With respect to a complaint alleging or the division's own belief
regarding a violation or noncompliance (violation), section 9 requires the division to:
Cause a diligent investigation into the violation to be made unless the complaint clearly appears to be frivolous or trivial or the complainant withdraws the complaint;
Notify the owner or operator of the applicable air pollution source of the complaint or the division's belief of an alleged violation within 30 days after the complaint was filed or the division discovered the alleged violation;
Consider all relevant evidence that it acquires when investigating the alleged violation; and
Determine whether a violation occurred within 90 days after the division gives notice that it has commenced an investigation on the matter.
If the division determines that a violation has occurred, current law
requires the division to issue a compliance order unless the responsible party gives timely notice that the violation occurred during a period of start-up, shutdown, or malfunction. Section 9 removes the exception for periods of start-up, shutdown, or malfunction.
Section 9 also requires, if a hearing is requested after the receipt
of a compliance order, the commission to provide at least 45 days' notice to any complainant that submitted a complaint alleging the applicable violation.
Section 9 also allows a complainant to submit a request for a
hearing within 20 calendar days after receipt of a determination by the division that no violation occurred.
Current law provides that any noncompliance that occurs during
a period of start-up, shutdown, or malfunction exempts the owner or operator of a source from the duty to pay penalties related to that noncompliance. Section 9 removes this provision.
Section 9 also allows a person, with respect to certain clean air
regulations, to commence a civil action (action) against an alleged violator for a current or past violation of the regulation. A person shall not commence an action until at least 60 days after a notice has been provided to the executive director of the department, the director of the division, and the alleged violator. Except for violations of an ongoing or recurring nature, any action that is not commenced within 5 years after the discovery of the alleged violation is time barred.
Current law requires the division to consider certain factors in
determining the amount of a civil penalty to assess for a violation. Section 10 requires the division to also consider the impact of the
violation on safety and wildlife and biological resources and the severity of the violation.
Current law provides that any action related to an alleged violation
of air quality laws that is not commenced within 5 years after the occurrence of the alleged violation is time barred. Section 11 excludes actions commenced to address a failure to obtain a permit from this statute of limitation.
Section 12 creates new electrification requirements and emissions
standards for stationary engines used in oil and gas operations.
Section 13 creates new control measures that must be included in
any state implementation plan for ozone adopted by the AQCC until a serious, severe, or extreme ozone nonattainment area in the state is redesignated as a maintenance area by the federal environmental protection agency.
Section 15 requires the district court, in a suit against a person that
has violated a state law, rule, or order related to oil and gas, to award the initial complaining party any costs of litigation incurred by the initial complaining party if the court determines that the award is appropriate.
Section 16 allows any person to submit a complaint to the oil and
gas conservation commission (COGCC) alleging a violation of a state law, rule, or order related to oil and gas. Upon receipt of the complaint, the COGCC or the director of the COGCC is required to promptly commence and complete an investigation into the violation alleged by the complaint, unless the complaint clearly appears on its face to be trivial or the complainant withdraws the complaint.
Section 17 requires the COGCC to evaluate and address adverse
cumulative impacts on the environment and disproportionately impacted communities for each permit application for a new or substantially modified oil and gas location through a cumulative impact analysis.
| House Sponsors | J. Bacon (D) J. Willford (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) J. Gonzales (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | Transportation and Energy | Status | Governor Signed (06/06/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-010
|
Title: |
Water Resources And Agriculture Review Committee |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/09/2023 | Description | Concerning the water resources and agriculture review committee. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - - Agriculture- Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Bridges (D) C. Simpson (R) House: B. McLachlan (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/23/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee. The bill
removes a reference to the water resources and agriculture review committee being an interim committee and removes an outdated reference to Senate Bill 96-074 in the legislative declaration. The bill also removes limitations on the number of meetings and the number of field trips the committee may hold and requires the committee to meet at least 4 times
during each calendar year.
| House Sponsors | B. McLachlan (D) | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (03/10/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-016
|
Title: |
Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Measures |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/10/2023 | Description | Concerning measures to promote reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in Colorado, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Energy- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: C. Hansen (D) House: E. Sirota (D) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (09/07/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 1 of the bill requires that, beginning in 2024, each
insurance company issued a certificate of authority to transact insurance business that reports more than $100 million on its annual schedule T filing with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) must participate in and complete the NAIC's Insurer Climate Risk Disclosure Survey or successor survey or reporting mechanism.
Section 2 requires the public employees' retirement association
(PERA) board, on or before June 1, 2024, to adopt proxy voting procedures that ensure that the board's voting decisions align with, and are supportive of, the statewide greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction goals.
Section 3 requires PERA to include as part of its annual
investment stewardship report, which report is posted on the PERA board's website, a description of climate-related investment risks, impacts, and strategies.
Section 4 adds wastewater thermal energy equipment to the
definition of pollution control equipment, which equipment may be certified by the division of administration (division) in the department of public health and environment (CDPHE). Similarly, section 5 adds wastewater thermal energy to the definition of clean heat resource, which resource a gas distribution utility includes in its clean heat plan filed with the public utilities commission.
Section 6 updates the statewide GHG emission reduction goals to
add a 65% reduction goal for 2035, an 80% reduction goal for 2040, and a 90% reduction goal for 2045 when compared to 2005 GHG pollution levels. Section 6 also increases the 2050 GHG emission reduction goal from 90% of 2005 GHG pollution levels to 100%.
Section 7 gives the oil and gas conservation commission
(COGCC) authority over class VI injection wells used for sequestration of GHG if the governor and COGCC determine, in accordance with a study that the COGCC conducted in 2021, that the state has sufficient resources to ensure the safe and effective regulation of the sequestration of GHG. If the governor and the COGCC determine there are sufficient resources, the COGCC may seek primacy under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and, when granted, may issue and enforce permits for class VI injection wells. The COGCC shall require, as part of its regulation of class VI injection wells, that operators of the wells maintain adequate financial assurance until the COGCC approves the closure of a class VI injection well site.
Section 8 establishes a state income tax credit in an amount equal
to 30% of the purchase price for new, electric-powered lawn equipment for purchases made in income tax years 2024 through 2026. A seller of new, electric-powered lawn equipment that demonstrates that it provided a purchaser a 30% discount from the purchase price of new, electric-powered lawn equipment may claim the tax credit.
Current law requires an electric retail utility (utility) to offer a net
metering credit as the means of purchasing output from a community solar garden (CSG) located within the utility's service territory and establishes the means of calculating the net metering credit. Section 9 maintains that calculation if the CSG indicates to the utility that the CSG's subscribers' bill credits change annually. If the CSG indicates to the utility
that the CSG's subscribers' bill credits remain fixed, however, section 9 provides a different calculation for determining the net metering credit.
Sections 10 through 12 incorporate projects to renovate or
recondition existing utility transmission lines into the Colorado Electric Transmission Authority Act, allowing the Colorado electric transmission authority to finance and renovate, rebuild, or recondition existing transmission lines in order to update and optimize the transmission lines.
Section 13 requires a local government to expedite its review of
a land use application that proposes a project to renovate, rebuild, or recondition existing transmission lines.
Section 14 makes a conforming amendment regarding the updated
statewide GHG emission reduction goals set forth in section 6.
| House Sponsors | E. Sirota (D) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | C. Hansen (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | Transportation and Energy | Status | Governor Signed (05/11/2023) | Amendments | - April 26, 2023: House Appropriations Committee Report
- April 24, 2023: House Finance Committee Report
- April 20, 2023: House Energy & Environment Committee Report
- April 06, 2023: Senate Appropriations Committee Report
- April 06, 2023: Senate Appropriations Committee Report
- February 21, 2023: Senate Finance Committee Report
- February 21, 2023: Senate Finance Committee Report
- January 25, 2023: L.001 Senate Transportation & Energy Committee
- January 25, 2023: L.002 Senate Transportation & Energy Committee
- January 25, 2023: L.003 Senate Transportation & Energy Committee
- January 25, 2023: Senate Transportation & Energy Committee Report
- January 25, 2023: Senate Transportation & Energy Committee Report
|
|
Bill:
SB23-038
|
Title: |
Prohibit Equine Slaughter For Human Consumption |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/12/2023 | Description | Concerning a prohibition on slaughtering equines for human consumption. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Business & Economic Development- Crimes, Corrections, & Enforcement | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: L. Garcia (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/20/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Oppose | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 1 of the bill establishes the crime of unlawful equine
slaughter. A person engages in unlawful equine slaughter if the person:
Slaughters an equine when the person knows or reasonably should know that any part of the equine will be used for human consumption;
Possesses, imports into the state, exports from the state,
buys, sells, gives away, or accepts an equine with the intent of killing, or having another person kill, the equine if the person knows or reasonably should know that any part of the equine will be used for human consumption; or
Possesses, imports into the state, exports from the state, buys, sells, gives away, or accepts equine meat if the person knows or reasonably should know that the meat will be used for human consumption.
Section 1 provides a safe harbor to the offense for equine
slaughtered for use by a facility in feeding predators housed at the facility.
Each equine that is unlawfully slaughtered and each 100 pounds
of equine meat derived from unlawful slaughter is a separate offense. A first violation is a class 1 misdemeanor with a mandatory minimum fine of $1,000, and a second or subsequent violation within a 10-year period is a class 5 felony with a mandatory minimum fine of $5,000. If a person obtains the equine by fraud and commits unlawful equine slaughter, it is a class 4 felony with a mandatory minimum fine of $10,000. In addition, a person that commits unlawful equine slaughter is forever prohibited from owning, possessing, or caring for an equine and from participating in a public livestock market for 3 to 5 years.
Sections 2 and 3 require notice of the crime of unlawful equine
slaughter to be given at livestock auctions and on bills of sale.
| House Sponsors | L. Garcia (D) | Senate Sponsors | S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Senate Second Reading Lost with Amendments - Committee, Floor (03/16/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-044
|
Title: |
Veterinary Education Loan Repayment Program |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/12/2023 | Description | Concerning updates to the veterinary education loan repayment program. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Higher Education | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Ginal (D) R. Pelton (R) House: K. McCormick (D) T. Winter (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/11/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill updates the veterinary education loan repayment program
in the following ways:
The number of qualified applicants per year is increased from 4 to 6;
The requirement that an applicant must have graduated from an accredited veterinary school in 2017 or later is
eliminated;
The total amount an applicant is eligible for over a 4-year period is increased from $70,000 to $90,000;
The yearly repayment amounts for successful applicants are increased; and
The state treasurer is required to transfer $540,000 from the general fund to the veterinary education loan repayment fund on September 1, 2023.
| House Sponsors | K. McCormick (D) T. Winter (R) | Senate Sponsors | J. Ginal (D) R. Pelton (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (06/02/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-050
|
Title: |
Eligibility For Agricultural Future Loan Program |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/17/2023 | Description | Concerning modifications to the Colorado agricultural future loan program, and, in connection therewith, modifying the eligibility requirements for the program and eliminating the repeal date for the loan program. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) House: R. Holtorf (R) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/28/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill changes the definitions of eligible business and eligible
farmer or rancher under the Colorado agricultural future loan program
to specify that:
Eligible businesses include entities that are currently in operation and ones that will be in operation;
Eligible businesses and eligible uses for the loan include businesses that conduct agricultural processing or ones that develop or manufacture technology designed to benefit farmers and ranchers; and
Eligible farmers and ranchers include farmers and ranchers that currently own or operate or will own or operate a farm or ranch.
The bill removes the repeal of the loan program.
| House Sponsors | R. Holtorf (R) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (03/22/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-092
|
Title: |
Agricultural Producers Use Of Agrivoltaics |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/30/2023 | Description | Concerning opportunities for voluntary emission reductions in agriculture, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: C. Hansen (D) C. Simpson (R) House: M. Soper (R) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/23/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | In support of the use of agrivoltaics, which is the integration of
solar energy generation facilities with agricultural activities, section 2 of the bill authorizes the agricultural drought and climate resilience office (office) to award grants for new or ongoing demonstration or research projects that demonstrate or study the use of agrivoltaics. On or before October 1, 2023, the office is required to convene a stakeholder group to
advise on whether the office should impose any operational requirements for agrivoltaic projects that apply for grants.
Section 4 authorizes the Colorado water conservation board
(board) to finance a project to study the feasibility of using aquavoltaics, which are solar energy generation facilities placed over, or floating on, irrigation canals or reservoirs.
Section 1 requires the director of the division of parks and wildlife
to consult on the impacts on wildlife of:
Any research projects for which the office awards money to study the use of agrivoltaics; and
The project that the board finances to study the feasibility of using aquavoltaics in the state.
Section 5 amends the statutory definition of solar energy facility,
used in determining the valuation of public utilities for property tax purposes, to include agrivoltaics and aquavoltaics.
Section 3 requires the commissioner of agriculture or the
commissioner's designee (commissioner), in consultation with the Colorado energy office, the air quality control commission, and an institution of higher education with expertise in climate change mitigation, adaptation benefits, and other environmental benefits related to agricultural research, to examine greenhouse gas reduction and carbon sequestration opportunities in the agricultural sector, including the use of dry digesters and the potential for creating and offering a certified greenhouse gas offset program and credit instruments in the agricultural sector.
Section 3 requires the commissioner to submit a progress report
on the study to the general assembly on or before October 1, 2024, and a final report, including any recommendations, on or before October 1, 2025.
Section 3 also authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to
implement the recommendations, but requires that any greenhouse gas offset program or other greenhouse gas reduction and carbon sequestration program or mechanism established in rule not mandate participation by agricultural producers.
| House Sponsors | M. Soper (R) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | C. Hansen (D) C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/18/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-103
|
Title: |
Update Colorado Recreational Use Statute |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 01/31/2023 | Description | Concerning the liability of owners of private land for damages that are incurred by persons who access the private land for recreational purposes. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Civil Law | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: M. Baisley (R) House: M. Lynch (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/08/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill amends the Colorado recreational use statute (CRUS). Section 1 of the bill amends the stated purposes of the CRUS. Section 2 amends definitions of terms and adds a definition of the
term inherent dangers or risks.
Section 3 changes the conditions under which the CRUS limits a
landowner's (owner's) liability for damages that occur as a result of other persons' use of the owner's land for recreational purposes. Section 3 also repeals limitations on the total amount of damages that may be recovered from a private landowner that leases land to a public entity for recreational purposes or that grants an easement or other right to use land to a public entity for recreational purposes. In place of these limitations, the bill substitutes language stating that, except as otherwise agreed by a public entity and an owner, an owner is not liable for losses resulting from a public entity's management, or failure to provide adequate management, of land that is used for recreational purposes. Section 3 also removes unused and redundant definitions of terms.
Section 4 amends several exceptions that describe circumstances
under which the CRUS does not limit an owner's liability. Specifically:
The CRUS allows an owner to be found liable for willful or malicious failure to guard or warn against a known dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity likely to cause harm. Section 4 limits this exception to apply only to malicious failures and amends the exception to apply to a known dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity likely to cause harm or death.
The CRUS includes an exception in cases in which an owner imposes a charge upon a person who goes on the land for recreational purposes. Section 4 removes certain language from this exception that is redundant with language that appears elsewhere in the CRUS.
The CRUS includes an exception concerning attractive nuisances. Section 4 provides that if a property used for public recreational purposes contains active or inactive agricultural operations; active or inactive mining operations, gravel operations, or other mineral and energy development; or certain water structures, neither the property nor the agricultural operations, nor the mining or gravel operations or other development, nor the water or water structures constitute an attractive nuisance.
The CRUS allows an owner to be held liable for injury received on land incidental to the use of land on which a commercial or business enterprise of any description is being carried on. However, when land is leased to a public entity for recreational purposes or a public entity has been granted an easement or other right to use land for recreational purposes, the land is not considered to be land upon which a business or commercial enterprise is being carried on. Section 4 removes this qualification from the exception.
Section 5 relocates language stating that the CRUS does not limit
the protections afforded to an owner under Colorado's premises liability statute. Section 5 also states that nothing in the CRUS creates a prescriptive easement on private land where an owner has acquiesced to public use of existing trails that have historically been used by the public for recreational purposes.
Current law allows the prevailing party in any civil action brought
by a recreational user for damages against a landowner who allows the use of the landowner's property for public recreational purposes to recover the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees as determined by the court. Section 6 states that in the event that an action is commenced by any party, the prevailing party is entitled to recover all fees, costs, and expenses, including fees and expenses of attorneys and experts and fees and expenses associated with appeals of the court's decision.
Section 7 states that nothing in the CRUS may be construed to
limit the authority of an owner to:
Determine any or all of the recreational purposes that are allowed on the owner's land;
Identify areas of the land where recreational purposes are allowed or not allowed; or
Restrict persons from engaging in recreational purposes on the owner's land.
Section 7 also describes means by which an owner who elects to take any of these actions may provide notice to the public of such actions. Section 7 also states that except as otherwise provided in the CRUS:
An owner owes no duty of care to keep the owner's premises safe for entry by other persons for recreational purposes or to give any warning of a dangerous condition, use, structure, or activity on the premises to persons entering the land for such purposes; and
Neither the installation of a sign or other form of warning of a dangerous condition, nor the failure to maintain or keep in place any sign or other warning, nor the failure to make any modification to improve safety creates any liability on the part of an owner when there is no other basis for liability.
| House Sponsors | M. Lynch (R) | Senate Sponsors | M. Baisley (R) | House Committee | | Senate Committee | Judiciary | Status | Senate Committee on Judiciary Postpone Indefinitely (03/01/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-159
|
Title: |
Sunset Colorado Food Systems Advisory Council |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/15/2023 | Description | Concerning the continuation of the Colorado food systems advisory council, and, in connection therewith, extending the sunset date by three years and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture- Public Health- State Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: N. Hinrichsen (D) B. Pelton (R) House: A. Boesenecker (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/19/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Sunset Process - Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources
Committee. The Colorado food systems advisory council established within Colorado state university is scheduled to repeal on September 1, 2023. The bill extends the sunset date until September 1, 2030.
| House Sponsors | A. Boesenecker (D) M. Lindsay (D) | Senate Sponsors | N. Hinrichsen (D) B. Pelton (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (06/02/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-166
|
Title: |
Establishment Of A Wildfire Resiliency Code Board |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 02/17/2023 | Description | Concerning the establishment of a wildfire resiliency code board, and, in connection therewith, requiring the wildfire resiliency code board to adopt model codes, requiring governing bodies with jurisdiction in an area within the wildland-urban interface to adopt codes that meet or exceed the standards set forth in the model codes, and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - State Government | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: T. Exum Sr. (D) L. Cutter (D) House: M. Froelich (D) E. Velasco (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/07/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Amend | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill establishes a wildfire resiliency code board (board) in the
division of fire prevention and control (division) within the department of public safety (department) for the purposes of ensuring community safety from and more resiliency to wildfires by reducing the risk of wildfires to people and property through the adoption of statewide codes and standards. The board consists of 21 appointed voting members with specific government or industry qualifications and 3 non-voting members. The board is required to promulgate rules concerning the adoption and administration of codes and standards for the hardening of structures and parcels in the wildland-urban interface in Colorado, including rules that:
Define the wildland-urban interface and identify areas of the state that are within it;
Adopt minimum codes and standards based on best practices to reduce the risk to life and property from the effects of wildfires;
Identify hazards and types of buildings, entities, and defensible space around structures to which the codes apply; and
Establish a process for a governing body to petition the board for a modification to the codes and establish the criteria and process for the board to grant or deny an appeal from a decision of the board on a petition for modification.
The bill also creates the wildfire resiliency code board cash fund
and continuously appropriates the money in the fund to the department to implement the provisions of the bill.
The bill requires a governing body with jurisdiction in an area
within the wildland-urban interface to adopt and enforce a code that meets or exceeds the minimum standards of the codes adopted by the board. Enforcement of the codes is done in accordance with the rules and regulations for code enforcement adopted by the governing body. If the governing body does not have rules and regulations for code enforcement, the governing body may request support from the division to enforce the code.
| House Sponsors | M. Froelich (D) E. Velasco (D) | Senate Sponsors | T. Exum Sr. (D) L. Cutter (D) | House Committee | Transportation, Housing and Local Government | Senate Committee | Local Government and Housing | Status | Governor Signed (05/12/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-192
|
Title: |
Sunset Pesticide Applicators' Act |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/16/2023 | Description | Concerning the continuation of the "Pesticide Applicators' Act", and, in connection therewith, implementing recommendations contained in the 2022 sunset report by the department of regulatory agencies regarding the act, and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) D. Roberts (D) House: B. McLachlan (D) C. Kipp (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/10/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Sunset Process - Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources
Committee. The bill implements some of the recommendations of the
department of regulatory agencies, as contained in the department's sunset review of the Pesticide Applicators' Act (act), as follows:
Sections 1 and 2 of the bill continue the act for 11 years, until September 1, 2034;
Section 3 updates the statutory definition of use to align with the federal definition adopted by the federal environmental protection agency;
Section 4 increases the maximum civil penalty for a violation of the act from $1,000 to $2,500 for the first violation, which results in the possibility of a maximum civil penalty of $5,000 for a second violation;
Section 5 requires that money collected for civil penalties imposed under the act be transferred to the general fund;
Section 6 requires the commissioner of agriculture (commissioner) to publish and periodically update information on the department of agriculture's website about pesticide applicators' licensing and registration;
Section 7 requires the commissioner to establish an online complaint process;
Section 8 limits the number of terms that members of the advisory committee may serve to 2 terms, but allows a member representing the Colorado state university agricultural experiment station or extension service (CSU) or the Colorado department of public health and environment (CDPHE) to serve on the advisory committee for unlimited terms during the duration of the member's employment with CSU or CDPHE; and
Sections 9 to 11 place language in statutes governing local governments that mirrors the language in the act requiring a local government that adopts an ordinance or resolution about pesticides to submit information to the commissioner about the ordinance or resolution.
| House Sponsors | B. McLachlan (D) C. Kipp (D) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) D. Roberts (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-240
|
Title: |
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Dairy Plant Fees |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/24/2023 | Description | Concerning fees a dairy plant is required to pay to the department of public health and environment. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture- Public Health | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Bridges (D) B. Kirkmeyer (R) House: R. Bockenfeld (R) S. Bird (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/06/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Joint Budget Committee. The bill:
Removes a $50 fee for dairy plant employees who sample or test milk, cream, or any other dairy product;
Increases the licensing fee a dairy plant is required to pay by 30%; and
Creates a new fee of one cent for every 100 pounds of
milk, to be paid by a dairy plant that receives 20,000 pounds or more of milk each day.
The department of public health and environment is required to
cap the amount a dairy plant must pay in total for the licensing fee and volume of production fee at $150,000.
| House Sponsors | R. Bockenfeld (R) S. Bird (D) | Senate Sponsors | J. Bridges (D) B. Kirkmeyer (R) | House Committee | Appropriations | Senate Committee | Appropriations | Status | Governor Signed (04/25/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-255
|
Title: |
Wolf Depredation Compensation Fund |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/27/2023 | Description | Concerning the provision of compensation to people who suffer damages because of gray wolf depredation, and, in connection therewith, making and reducing appropriations. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) House: M. Catlin (R) J. McCluskie (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/03/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates the wolf depredation compensation fund (fund) to
compensate landowners and agricultural producers for depredation of livestock and working animals by wolves. For the 2023-24 state fiscal year and each state fiscal year thereafter, the state treasurer is directed to transfer $350,000 from the general fund to the fund. At the end of the
2023-24 and 2024-25 state fiscal years, any unencumbered balance in the fund that exceeds $100,000 is transferred to the wildlife cash fund. At the end of subsequent state fiscal years, the amount transferred to the wildlife cash fund is any unencumbered balance in the fund that exceeds 120% of the amount spent from the fund in the previous state fiscal year.
Each year, the director of the division of parks and wildlife will
issue a report and make a presentation at the appropriate SMART Act hearing.
The bill reduces by $175,000 the fiscal year 2023-24 general fund
appropriation to the department of natural resources for use by the division of parks and wildlife for the reintroduction and management of gray wolves.
| House Sponsors | M. Catlin (R) J. McCluskie (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/23/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-256
|
Title: |
Management Of Gray Wolves Reintroduction |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 03/27/2023 | Description | Concerning prerequisites to the management of gray wolves prior to the wolves being reintroduced. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) House: M. Soper (R) M. Lukens (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (07/05/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Support | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill prohibits the introduction of gray wolves into an area if:
The United States secretary of the interior has not made a final determination as to whether the gray wolf population in the area is experimental, which gives the state greater flexibility to manage the wolves; or
The United States secretary of the interior or the United
States department of agriculture has not completed an environmental impact study under federal law.
| House Sponsors | M. Soper (R) M. Lukens (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Vetoed (05/16/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-266
|
Title: |
Neonic Pesticides As Limited-use Pesticides |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/04/2023 | Description | Concerning a requirement that the commissioner of agriculture designate neonicotinoid pesticides as limited-use pesticides. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Agriculture- Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: K. Priola (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) House: K. Brown (D) C. Kipp (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/29/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill requires that, on or before January 1, 2024, the
commissioner of agriculture adopt rules designating neonicotinoid pesticides as limited-use pesticides, limiting their use to licensed pesticide applicators, and authorizing only licensed dealers to sell them. The commissioner's rules must exempt certain products that contain
neonicotinoid pesticides from the limited-use pesticide designation, including products intended for use:
As pet care products;
By licensed veterinarians;
As indoor personal care products related to lice or bedbugs;
As agricultural products;
For academic research; and
As wood coating products.
| House Sponsors | K. Brown (D) C. Kipp (D) | Senate Sponsors | K. Priola (D) S. Jaquez Lewis (D) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/17/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-270
|
Title: |
Projects To Restore Natural Stream Systems |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/05/2023 | Description | Concerning activities that restore the environmental health of natural stream systems without administration. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) House: M. Catlin (R) K. McCormick (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/03/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates a rebuttable presumption that a project that is
designed and constructed within a natural stream system for certain restoration purposes (stream restoration project) does not cause material injury to vested water rights (rebuttable presumption). A holder of a vested water right may challenge the rebuttable presumption by sufficiently demonstrating in a court of competent jurisdiction that the
operation of the stream restoration project has caused material injury to a vested water right.
The bill also requires that, at least 63 calendar days before the
commencement of a stream restoration project, the owner or proponent of the stream restoration project register the project with the state engineer and provide notice to the substitute water supply plan notification list (registration and notice requirement).
Upon the completion of a stream restoration project, the owner or
proponent of the stream restoration project shall file a completion report with the state engineer.
If a stream restoration project is limited to certain minor
restoration activities:
The stream restoration project does not cause material injury to any vested water right;
The stream restoration project is not an unnecessary dam or other obstruction; and
The owner or proponent of the stream restoration project is not required to comply with the registration and notice requirement.
| House Sponsors | M. Catlin (R) K. McCormick (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) C. Simpson (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (06/05/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-274
|
Title: |
Water Quality Control Fee-setting By Rule |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/11/2023 | Description | Concerning water quality regulation in the state, and, in connection therewith, transferring fee-setting authority to the water quality control commission and modifying the membership of the commission. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment- Public Health- Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: F. Winter (D) House: W. Lindstedt (D) R. Dickson (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (06/27/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Monitor | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | Section 1 of the bill increases the percent of appropriated funds
that the department of public health and environment (department) may use for the administration and management of the public water systems
and domestic wastewater treatment works grant program from 5% to 10%.
Section 3 modifies the composition of the water quality control
commission (commission) by requiring that:
No more than 5 members of the commission be affiliated with the same political party; and
The commission include members with specific types of expertise, including expertise in areas of science and environmental law or policy or areas such as municipal water or wastewater treatment, industry, or labor.
Section 4 requires the commission, on or before October 31, 2025,
and after engaging in stakeholder outreach, to set the following fees by rule:
Drinking water fees assessed on public water systems;
Commerce and industry sector permitting fees;
Construction sector permitting fees;
Pesticide sector permitting fees;
Public and private utilities sector permitting fees;
Municipal separate storm sewer systems sector permit fees;
Review fees for requests for certification under section 401 of the federal Clean Water Act;
Preliminary effluent limitation determination fees;
Wastewater site application and design review fees;
On-site wastewater treatment system fees; and
Biosolids management program fees.
The commission's fee-setting rules must become effective on or
before January 1, 2026, and the commission may by rule authorize the division to phase in the fee-setting rules.
Section 4 also creates the clean water cash fund into which the
fees collected under the commission's rules, other than the drinking water fees assessed on public water systems, are credited.
The statutory fee provisions in sections 2, 5, 6, and 8 repeal on
July 1, 2026. Before the repeal, the state treasurer is required to transfer any money remaining in the various funds into which the statutory fees are credited to the clean water cash fund; except that section 2 specifies that drinking water fees will continue to be credited to the drinking water cash fund and that any money in the drinking water cash fund will remain in that cash fund.
Section 7 repeals the division's regulatory authority concerning
nuclear and radioactive wastes.
Section 9 requires the division to include, in its annual reporting
to the commission and the general assembly, information on:
The division's implementation and enforcement of the discharge permitting program (program);
For reports submitted before October 1, 2025, the division's
fee revenue and direct and indirect costs associated with the program; and
For the report submitted in 2025, the fee structure set forth in the commission's proposed or adopted fee-setting rules.
| House Sponsors | W. Lindstedt (D) R. Dickson (D) | Senate Sponsors | F. Winter (D) | House Committee | Energy and Environment | Senate Committee | Finance | Status | Governor Signed (05/17/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-275
|
Title: |
Colorado Wild Horse Project |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/11/2023 | Description | Concerning managing wild horses, and, in connection therewith, authorizing the creation of an entity to support management of wild horse herds in Colorado, seeking long-term solutions for horses removed from the wild range, and making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Natural Resources & Environment | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: J. Ginal (D) P. Will (R) House: M. Duran (D) M. Lynch (R) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/04/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates the Colorado wild horse management project (wild
horse project), which is a nonprofit, state-owned corporate entity that
manages and operates programs benefitting wild horses and supports wild horse management. The director of the wild horse project will be selected by a committee of the governor, the commissioner of agriculture, the executive director of the department of natural resources, and the majority leader of the house of representatives. The wild horse project has the powers normally afforded to a nonprofit corporate entity. The wild horse project will annually report to the governor, the joint budget committee, and the appropriate joint legislative committee at SMART Act hearings.
The wild horse project may seek federal payment for wild horse
management support activities and gifts, grants, or donations. On the effective date of the bill, the state treasurer is required to transfer $1.5 million from the general fund to the wild horse project fund, which is created for use by the wild horse project.
A working group is established by the wild horse project to study
and pursue long-term solutions for wild horses that are removed from federal horse management areas or held in federal facilities and make recommendations to the governor and the general assembly. The working group will have representation from the executive branch, the legislative branch, nonprofit organizations, businesses, the western slope, and the ranching community. The Colorado state director of the federal bureau of land management (bureau), the Southern Ute Tribe, and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe may appoint representatives to the working group.
A wild horse stewardship program is created to help manage range
health and infrastructure. The wild horse fertility control program is created to manage the wild horse herd population by collaborating, coordinating, and training people and entities to manage wild horse populations. Both programs are overseen by the wild horse project.
The commissioner of agriculture is required to provide support in
the form of grants and contracts to assist with managing wild horse populations using fertility control methods, subject to approval by the bureau, until July 31, 2024, or until the wild horse project commences its own program to manage wild horse populations if commenced earlier than July 31, 2024.
| House Sponsors | M. Duran (D) M. Lynch (R) | Senate Sponsors | J. Ginal (D) P. Will (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/20/2023) | Amendments | |
|
Bill:
SB23-295
|
Title: |
Colorado River Drought Task Force |
Votes | Votes all Legislators | Hearing Date | | Hearing Time | | Hearing Room | | Intro Date | 04/20/2023 | Description | Concerning the creation of the Colorado river drought task force, and, in connection therewith, making an appropriation. | History | Bill History | Save to Calendar | | Bill Subject | - Water | Bill Docs | Bill Documents | Sponsors (House and Senate) | Senate: D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) House: M. Catlin (R) J. McCluskie (D) | Fiscal Notes | Fiscal Notes (08/04/2023) | Full Text | Full Text of Bill | Lobbyists | Lobbyists | Position | Pending | Category | | Comment | | Custom Summary | | Summary | The bill creates the Colorado river drought task force (task force).
The members of the task force must, to the extent practicable, reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of the state and have experience with a wide range of water issues. The task force must begin meeting no later than July 31, 2023, and may hold up to 12 meetings in the 2023 legislative interim.
The purpose of the task force is to develop recommendations for
state legislation that provides additional tools for the Colorado water conservation board to collaborate with the Colorado river water conservation district, the southwestern water conservation district, and other relevant stakeholders in the development of programs that address drought in the Colorado river basin and interstate commitments related to the Colorado river and its tributaries through conservation of the waters of the Colorado river and its tributaries (recommendations).
No later than December 15, 2023, the task force must submit a
written report that includes the recommendations and a summary of the task force's work to the water resources and agriculture review committee.
| House Sponsors | M. Catlin (R) J. McCluskie (D) | Senate Sponsors | D. Roberts (D) P. Will (R) | House Committee | Agriculture, Water and Natural Resources | Senate Committee | Agriculture and Natural Resources | Status | Governor Signed (05/20/2023) | Amendments | |
|
|