Overview of the BillPersonal Recognizance Bond Clarification
Under current law:
Courts must release a person on a personal recognizance bond if the offense carries a maximum penalty of 6 months or less in jail.
The court cannot require any financial security for appearance unless specific conditions exist.
Bill Clarifications:
These provisions apply to both state and municipal courts.
Adds a condition allowing the court to require security if the defendant failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case.
Monetary Conditions for Release
Current Law:
Courts cannot impose monetary conditions for release for:
Traffic offenses
Petty offenses
Comparable municipal offenses
Municipal offenses with no comparable state misdemeanor
Some exceptions already exist.
New Exceptions Added by the Bill:
Courts can impose monetary conditions if:
The offense is a petty offense for:
Theft
Criminal mischief
Arson
Comparable municipal offenses
Municipal offenses involving threats of violence, injury, or property damage
And the defendant has failed to appear 2 or more times in the present case.
The offense is any other petty offense, traffic offense, or comparable municipal offense if:
The defendant has failed to appear 3 or more times in the present case.
The defendant has another pending charge for the same offense in the same jurisdiction.
Failure to Appear Conditions
The bill applies these new monetary condition exceptions only if:
Before issuing an arrest warrant for a previous failure to appear, the court searched to see if the defendant was in a correctional facility or county jail.
At the time of the previous failure to appear, the court had specific processes in place to handle such cases.
Key Takeaways
Courts must grant personal recognizance bonds for low-level offenses but can require security if the defendant has missed court twice in the same case.
Courts can now impose monetary conditions for certain petty offenses and traffic violations if the defendant has multiple prior failures to appear.
New monetary condition rules only apply if the court verified the defendant’s custody status before issuing a warrant for previous failures to appear.
Summary
Under current law, a court is required to release a person on a
personal recognizance bond if the person was charged with an offense for a violation with a maximum penalty that does not exceed 6 months' imprisonment, and the court cannot require the person to give security of any kind for their appearance for trial other than their personal recognizance, unless certain conditions exist. The bill clarifies these provisions apply in both state and municipal courts. The bill adds to the conditions for which a person may be required to give security that the defendant previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case.
Existing law prohibits a court from imposing a monetary condition
of release for a defendant charged with a traffic offense, petty offense, or comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state misdemeanor offense, with specified exceptions. The bill adds exceptions for:
A petty offense for theft, criminal mischief, or arson, or a comparable municipal offense, or a municipal offense involving threats of violence, injury, or property damage, if the defendant has previously failed to appear in court 2 or more times in the present case; and
Any other petty offense, traffic offense, or a comparable municipal offense or a municipal offense for which there is no comparable state offense, if the defendant has previously failed to appear for a court proceeding 3 or more times in the present case and has another pending charge for the same offense in the same jurisdiction.
The bill applies the exceptions involving previous instances of a
defendant's failure to appear for a court proceeding only when, prior to issuing a warrant for the arrest of the defendant for the previous failure to appear, the court conducted a search to determine whether the defendant was being held in a correctional facility or county jail, and at the time of the previous failure to appear, the court had certain processes in place governing failures to appear.